From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0Ly6-00025k-By for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E253AE05C3; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D44E05C3 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CDD644E3 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.418 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.418 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1adz60GTIbtb for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB316450A for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L0LxW-0004Pg-Da for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:02 +0000 Received: from c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.178.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:02 +0000 Received: from reader by c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:05:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Harry Putnam Subject: [gentoo-user] Is equery depends still viable Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:04:52 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87prl0n21n.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:I8O5S4KwhYX1EIOqTtMKG4FQ6Q0= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 1a43ffef-2c6f-4412-b356-3cff5edd58ca X-Archives-Hash: 324b378757f315ded302dd722d9b510d With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?