From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:36:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oe481sms.fsf@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7573e9640511242305y3e9a4dd3p6cf3cfbac2e70de3@mail.gmail.com
Richard Fish <bigfish@asmallpond.org> writes:
> Interesting. All 3 builds currently in portage (1.6.2-r4, 1.8.0, and
> 1.8.0-r1) use toolchain-funcs already.
>
> What is the result of
First let me add that (mjpegtools-1.6.2-r3) isn't even installed:
root # qpkg -v -I |grep mjpegtools
media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1 *
> ls /usr/portage/media-video/jpegtools/*.ebuild
I'm guessing that is a typo and you meant mjpegtools
ls /usr/portage/media-video/mjpegtools/*.ebuild
/usr/portage/media-video/mjpegtools/mjpegtools-1.6.2-r4.ebuild
/usr/portage/media-video/mjpegtools/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1.ebuild
/usr/portage/media-video/mjpegtools/mjpegtools-1.8.0.ebuild
>
> equery depends mjpegtools
equery depends mjpegtools
[ Searching for packages depending on mjpegtools... ]
media-video/transcode-0.6.14-r2
media-video/cinelerra-cvs-20050801
both are installed here:
# qpkg -v -I |grep 'transcode\|cinelerra'
media-video/transcode-0.6.14-r2 *
media-video/cinelerra-cvs-20050801 *
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-25 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-25 4:09 [gentoo-user] How serious is revdep-rebuild failure Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 3:32 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 6:15 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 7:05 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 7:06 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 18:39 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 19:28 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 19:02 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-25 20:34 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 20:50 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 20:42 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-25 22:11 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 20:55 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 20:22 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 20:38 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 19:53 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 22:09 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 21:56 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 23:59 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-26 0:09 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-26 4:08 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-26 6:43 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-26 6:37 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-26 8:15 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-26 14:35 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-26 18:09 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-27 0:52 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-27 6:45 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-27 16:52 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-27 0:54 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-27 6:51 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 18:36 ` Harry Putnam [this message]
2005-11-25 18:04 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-25 19:32 ` Harry Putnam
2005-11-25 19:25 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-25 10:31 ` [gentoo-user] " Nagatoro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oe481sms.fsf@newsguy.com \
--to=reader@newsguy.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox