From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HeUGn-0006dC-FJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:53:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3JApn3b002318; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:51:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3JAkHKG027644 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:46:17 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3E364DD7 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:46:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.623 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.623 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.073, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MeH5vwovdJFh for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BE64B6F for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HeU9J-0006qY-7n for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:46:01 +0200 Received: from c-68-51-187-92.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([68.51.187.92]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:46:01 +0200 Received: from reader by c-68-51-187-92.hsd1.ga.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:46:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: reader@newsguy.com Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: FUSE (was: Add a module post kernel config/build) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:45:52 -0400 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87lkgolk0v.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <873b2y59i7.fsf@newsguy.com> <2325869.f2q9DNFP8c@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <20070418135051.3d23b2a7@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <1609263.41bEaePWJD@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <20070418160005.48bb966c@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <87zm55tcve.fsf@newsguy.com> <11547404.4p5OfFQ3W6@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-68-51-187-92.hsd1.ga.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eBL+0aQdBpsg7E6RApBrnf5ryL0= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: bff259de-b005-4e77-9f97-cd3b421b15e5 X-Archives-Hash: ccd862f606939800cb21ca93d6978bd1 Alexander Skwar writes: > reader@newsguy.com wrote: > >> I have sys-fs/fuse installed. >> # eix -I fuse >> [I] sys-fs/fuse >> Available versions: 2.6.1 2.6.3 >> Installed versions: 2.6.3(06:56:33 03/20/07)(-kernel_FreeBSD >> kernel_linux) >> Homepage: http://fuse.sourceforge.net >> Description: An interface for filesystems implemented in >> userspace. >> >> [I] sys-fs/sshfs-fuse >> Available versions: 1.6 (~)1.7 >> Installed versions: 1.7(06:38:10 02/22/07) >> Homepage: http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html >> Description: Fuse-filesystem utilizing the sftp service. >> >> Should I have a fuse module? > > If you've build fuse for the currently running kernel, then > yes, you should've. > >> root # find /lib/modules -iname '*fuse*' >> /lib/modules/2.6.19-gentoo-r4/fs/fuse.ko >> /lib/modules/2.6.19-gentoo-r4/kernel/fs/fuse >> /lib/modules/2.6.19-gentoo-r4/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko >> >> I guess I'm kind of lost here, as to what has happened... > > hm. What's unclear? You have build fuse only for this kernel > version. When you update your kernel, you'll need to rebuild > all the external modules (fuse, maybe alsa, ...). module-rebuild > is your friend. Whats unclear is why I have to do anything extra for this kernel when I did not in past 2. I don't understand why it didn't get built with `genkernel all' as in previous 2 kernels. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list