[gentoo-user] stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[gentoo-user] stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[Harry Putnam]

Attempting to install stumpwm-cvs I run into an emerge failure with on
of the dependencies; dev-lisp/cmucl.

Below is a snippet from the end of the emerge of
dev-lisp/cmucl-l-19d_p2.  Can anyone see what might be the problem?

[...]

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=i686 -pipe -rdynamic -Wstric
-g -DGENCGC -DLINKAGE_TABLE -D__NO_CTYPE -I. -I../../src/lisp
nclude -DGENCGC -DLINKAGE_TABLE  -c -o lisp.o ../../src/lisp/
cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote inste
In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:25,
                 from ../../src/lisp/Linux-os.h:24,
                 from ../../src/lisp/os.h:41,
                 from ../../src/lisp/lisp.c:23:
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h:2:25: error: unistd_32.h: No such f
../../src/lisp/lisp.c: In function 'sigint_handler':
../../src/lisp/lisp.c:45: warning: unused variable 'code'
../../src/lisp/lisp.c: In function 'default_cmucllib':
../../src/lisp/lisp.c:182: warning: assignment discards quali
target type
../../src/lisp/lisp.c: In function 'main':
../../src/lisp/lisp.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of f
../../src/lisp/lisp.c:512: warning: implicit declaration of f
ections'
gmake: *** [lisp.o] Error 1
src/tools/load-world.sh: line 17: build-2/lisp/lisp: No such 
Failed to build build-2!
 * 
 * ERROR: dev-lisp/cmucl-19d_p2 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *               ebuild.sh, line   49:  Called src_compile
 *             environment, line 2116:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *       src/tools/build.sh -C "" -o "bin/lisp -core lib/cmuc
tch -noinit -nositeinit" || die
 *  The die message:
 *   (no error message)

Re: [gentoo-user] stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila]

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

> Attempting to install stumpwm-cvs I run into an emerge failure with on
> of the dependencies; dev-lisp/cmucl.
>
> Below is a snippet from the end of the emerge of
> dev-lisp/cmucl-l-19d_p2.  Can anyone see what might be the problem?
>
> [...]

Hi.

First of all, It's not encouraged to use stumpwm-cvs ebuild as it's
obsolete [1].

And regarding cmucl build error, there's a bug report on b.g.o. with a
patch that seems to fix it [2].

HTH.

Cheers

===============================
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196982
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228583

-- 
Emacs, n.:
	A slow-moving parody of a text editor.
 - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL cert

Re: [gentoo-user] stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

{OT}

2008/11/16 fortune wrote:

>
> Emacs, n.:
>        A slow-moving parody of a text editor.
>  - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL
> cert
>

Damn!
Of course, signature statements are not shared by poster... :(

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 530 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[Harry Putnam]

galiza.ceive@gmail.com (Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila) writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
>
>> Attempting to install stumpwm-cvs I run into an emerge failure with on
>> of the dependencies; dev-lisp/cmucl.
>>
>> Below is a snippet from the end of the emerge of
>> dev-lisp/cmucl-l-19d_p2.  Can anyone see what might be the problem?
>>
>> [...]
>
> Hi.
>
> First of all, It's not encouraged to use stumpwm-cvs ebuild as it's
> obsolete [1].

Its probably another bug that that fact is not included in the portage
desc statement.

> And regarding cmucl build error, there's a bug report on b.g.o. with a
> patch that seems to fix it [2].

I've downloaded that but not used it yet.
But I seem to recall that when you change an ebuild, you can't just
install it then ... but have to create a new ebuild or some such?


>> Emacs, n.:
>>        A slow-moving parody of a text editor.
>>  - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL
>> cert
>>
>
> Damn!
> Of course, signature statements are not shared by poster... :(

Gack, you were almost caught in print disparaging the `One True Editor'

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: stumpwm users .. need help with failed emerge

[Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

> galiza.ceive@gmail.com (Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila) writes:

>> And regarding cmucl build error, there's a bug report on b.g.o. with a
>> patch that seems to fix it [2].
>
> I've downloaded that but not used it yet.
> But I seem to recall that when you change an ebuild, you can't just
> install it then ... but have to create a new ebuild or some such?
>

Yes, you should create a new ebuild with an additional epatch line
aiming to downloaded b.g.o. patch, and put it on an overlay (if not, changes will
dissappear when syncing portage tree next time).

Look at the cmucl ebuild source, and you'll see it's pretty straightforward.

-- 
<spyderous> kurt needs to allow sudo /usr/bin/nano
<seemant> talk to him then :P
<spyderous> i tried =P
<spyderous> he said, be a man
<seemant> HA!
 - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL cert

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 196 bytes --]