From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QEqlE-0006FH-Bv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:29:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 445701C001; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C6A1C001 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676661BC0CF for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:27:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.286 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.286 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.687, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uyegz-1sYeD for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E4F1BC031 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEqjN-00037T-Sq for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:27:41 +0200 Received: from c-98-215-231-30.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.231.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:27:41 +0200 Received: from reader by c-98-215-231-30.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:27:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Harry Putnam Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT router advice] a router capable of detailed logs Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:27:06 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87liywd4xx.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <878vv69asl.fsf@newsguy.com> <87sjt6cjvo.fsf@newsguy.com> <201104251945.16273.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-231-30.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8tourvHCV73m+cp1iGAPiCXnW7o= X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4e62f978d45f522d9169b3147ebdc84f Mick writes: >> After turning remote admin on, and setting a single IP address to be >> able to connect... I still cannot access it for remote admin on 8080. > > Did you try this from the Internet, or from within your LAN? Inside lan. I guess you are saying that connection is expected be from outside? Haven't had the opportunity for that yet. The only remote machine I have access is to is a shell account on a gentoo machine, so lynx, and I've seen on home lan that the device responds to lynx telling me I need a newer browser, when I hit it by IP using lynx. Jumping up the thread a bit now, after Pauls excellent input. I see that iptables cmd is known on the OS, but man I really had not wanted to pound my way thru iptables to the point of competency.