Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Justin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

b.n. schrieb:
> Hi,
> Not being quite an early adopter, I was nonetheless thinking about 
> upgrading to firefox-3.
>
> I did a bit of googling and I found this bug:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228283
> where the final comment says that OOo 2.4.x and firefox 3 are not 
> compatible. The bug is signed as INVALID.
>
> What does it mean? Aren't they really compatible? And why?
>
> m.
>
I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to handle 
the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the xulrunner 
instead.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[b.n.]

Hi,
Not being quite an early adopter, I was nonetheless thinking about 
upgrading to firefox-3.

I did a bit of googling and I found this bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228283
where the final comment says that OOo 2.4.x and firefox 3 are not 
compatible. The bug is signed as INVALID.

What does it mean? Aren't they really compatible? And why?

m.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[b.n.]

Justin ha scritto:
> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to handle 
> the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the xulrunner 
> instead.

Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?

m.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Justin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]

b.n. schrieb:
> Justin ha scritto:
>> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to 
>> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the 
>> xulrunner instead.
>
> Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?
>
> m.
>
>
>
I included java, but never tried moznopango. Java is working.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Graham Murray]

"b.n." <brullonulla@gmail.com> writes:

> Justin ha scritto:
>> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to
>> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the
>> xulrunner instead.
>
> Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?

What you have to do is to remove the 'firefox' USE flag from all other
ebuilds. You do not have to remove the use flags from the
mozilla-firefox ebuild.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[b.n.]

Graham Murray ha scritto:
> "b.n." <brullonulla@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Justin ha scritto:
>>> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to
>>> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the
>>> xulrunner instead.
>> Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?
> 
> What you have to do is to remove the 'firefox' USE flag from all other
> ebuilds. You do not have to remove the use flags from the
> mozilla-firefox ebuild.
> 

Oh, ok! I understand now.
Why is it so? Will need to be done also when firefox 3 hits stable x86?

m.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Sebastian Beßler]

b.n. schrieb:

> Oh, ok! I understand now.
> Why is it so? Will need to be done also when firefox 3 hits stable x86?

This is so because a number of apps don't build against Firefox 3 at 
this time.

[gentoo-user] Re: incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[»Q«]

On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:25:02 +0200
"b.n." <brullonulla@gmail.com> wrote:

> Graham Murray ha scritto:
> > "b.n." <brullonulla@gmail.com> writes:
> >   
> >> Justin ha scritto:  
> >>> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to
> >>> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add
> >>> the xulrunner instead.  
> >> Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?  
> > 
> > What you have to do is to remove the 'firefox' USE flag from all
> > other ebuilds. You do not have to remove the use flags from the
> > mozilla-firefox ebuild.
> 
> Oh, ok! I understand now.
> Why is it so? 

OOo 2.4.1 depends on the Mozilla 1.8 libraries, which it can get
from either  Fx 2 or xulrunner 1.8.x.

Fx 3 uses Mozilla 1.9 libs (which are also available in 
xulrunner 1.9.x).

> Will need to be done also when firefox 3 hits stable x86?

I believe the reason xulrunner is slotted is so that there's always
something that can supply dependencies.  I'm not sure what the plan is
for stabilizing Fx 3.

-- 
»Q«
     Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[b.n.]

Sebastian Beßler ha scritto:
> b.n. schrieb:
> 
>> Oh, ok! I understand now.
>> Why is it so? Will need to be done also when firefox 3 hits stable x86?
> 
> This is so because a number of apps don't build against Firefox 3 at 
> this time.

:(

Guess I'll wait for it to hit stable.

m.

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Philip Webb]

080809 b.n. wrote:
> I was thinking about upgrading to firefox-3.
> I did a bit of googling and I found this bug:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228283
> where the final comment is that OOo 2.4.x & Firefox 3 are not compatible.
> The bug is signed as INVALID.  Aren't they really compatible? And why?

I've been using Firefox 3.0.1 & OpenOffice 2.4.1 since 080719
& have encountered no problems.  For Firefox, my USE flags are :

  USE="-bindist -custom-optimization dbus -gnome -iceweasel -ipv6 java
       -mozdevelop -restrict-javascript -startup-notification -xulrunner"

and for OpenOffice :

  USE="-binfilter cups dbus -debug -eds -firefox -gnome -gstreamer gtk java
       kde -ldap -mono -odk opengl -pam -seamonkey -xulrunner"

my system LANG is 'en_US.UTF-8'.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca

Re: [gentoo-user] incompatibility between OOo and firefox 3 ?

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Samstag, 9. August 2008, Graham Murray wrote:
> "b.n." <brullonulla@gmail.com> writes:
> > Justin ha scritto:
> >> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to
> >> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add the
> >> xulrunner instead.
> >
> > Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?
>
> What you have to do is to remove the 'firefox' USE flag from all other
> ebuilds. You do not have to remove the use flags from the
> mozilla-firefox ebuild.

no.

Just set the xulrunner useflag in make.conf and unset the firefox flag. There 
is no ebuild editing needed.