From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-111165-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OFG4L-000306-V1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:26:30 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 316ACE0757;
	Fri, 21 May 2010 05:25:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (newton.gmurray.org.uk [81.2.114.237])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2558E0757
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 05:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4L5PPII014700
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 06:25:26 +0100
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.4 newton.gmurray.org.uk o4L5PPII014700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmurray.org.uk;
	s=in200703; t=1274419526;
	bh=2znNu/bn8kmZ2CUz/CPTU/ldKdCJ62IUgFQwxnx4kVk=; l=284;
	h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type;
	b=G3TUklqxLl1SoNcockYG3ZXNE5wxTfE9eziX2vVYI3yi3zkSz6g/AojibfeZDhfbz
	 cqG+NjKOPTF9n+mHdyIMVB1m41USW/0+jqZtqUNYKLO6VJbY2ubicxkMSvGg5pVqPG
	 zvB6RDO4MAkkJ/lzrGbv4nbtUO9KTTexG6X3P/GU=
X-BATV: Sendmail BATV Filter v0.4.0 newton o4L5PPII014700
Received: (from graham@localhost)
	by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4L5PPWu014699;
	Fri, 21 May 2010 06:25:25 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: newton.gmurray.org.uk: graham set sender to graham@gmurray.org.uk using -f
From: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: nouveau-drm compile failure
References: <AANLkTinMFODi6NSzZhg5pK8-jACx6UrekrGL8-FRNeJy@mail.gmail.com>
	<ht3rme$cab$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<201005202059.57267.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
	<87ljbepefc.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
	<AANLkTik7thIFwNtu8V8D9NARc9-MjsNArwYV5OQjOg9F@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 06:25:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik7thIFwNtu8V8D9NARc9-MjsNArwYV5OQjOg9F@mail.gmail.com>
	(Grant's message of "Thu, 20 May 2010 16:06:59 -0700")
Message-ID: <87hbm1q116.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at newton
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Archives-Salt: 038dbe11-4b52-466a-917a-560b17650586
X-Archives-Hash: 134ee38cff4375e919daa5de9273dadc

Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> writes:

> Google says the error can be due to disabling dri in xorg.conf, but I
> don't have anything like that.  Should CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=y include
> the dri or dri2 module?

The dri and dri2 modules should be installed by x11-base/xorg-server.