From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-78288-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1JkIA7-0006g1-Qd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:15:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE7EDE0508; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (newton.gmurray.org.uk [81.2.114.237]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418FE0508 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (graham@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3BCFKYm009337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:15:20 +0100 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.2 newton.gmurray.org.uk m3BCFKYm009337 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmurray.org.uk; s=in200703; t=1207916120; bh=s6/pmMzmZj87InIh+BnrCdRPDo51WdVhy14t37 bc8BU=; l=463; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nlj+Sjj9TOk8VixIxOpQWw26Md slVcEBz+4v4XS/9WLNsEyHZaCPSEftF1ZKH765aCFBtCnkXs2MdSkY+ksg0NSWyFlee VPmKKhEVeWFHynWfcgRAhJFMnx8MR8l7h3nPMO6SDyfxCbbmQINcUjQWkJltB1S4Jmt R78qF2eGzOc= Received: (from graham@localhost) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m3BCFKjF009336; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:15:20 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: newton.gmurray.org.uk: graham set sender to graham@gmurray.org.uk using -f From: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] blocking package can't be found References: <200804091740.41507.uwix@iway.na> <200804101002.33271.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <47FDFBFD.2020609@bellsouth.net> <200804101410.32276.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20080410145755.58aa3848@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> X-Hashcash: 1:22:080411:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org::Ic8k8M/sXvhf/LQM:000000000000000000000000000000000MtaE Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:15:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080410145755.58aa3848@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> (Neil Bothwick's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:57:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87fxtssi3r.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110008 (No Gnus v0.8) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Archives-Salt: 3d32fee9-85f3-4646-90a9-e614fc74760c X-Archives-Hash: 20c3a938b92d89ebb8f67d190771d35a Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> writes: > Because of the nature of a block, only one of the named packages can be > installed, so just unmerge that one, wherever it appears in the block > message :) Is that always true? I seem to remember seeing cases where an upgrade of X wanted to install A and the upgrade of Y wanted to install B, and the blocker saying that A blocks B when neither (the specific versions of) A nor B are currently installed. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list