From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:09:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehwf2abg.fsf@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAEH5T2N-SkRh5bX1JnwbNaQwf38491S0d4FEzWzeeu+aB_=v8g@mail.gmail.com
Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> This is a brand new install, and I've changed very little. I've done
>> nothing consciously to effect how many jobs are to be run.
>
> In that case I think it is working normally. It won't run more than 1
> job unless you ask it to do so.
I followed another thread recently about this, and I understood the
new behavior is set this way because emerge will be running more than
1 job and that would be a mess to put into one terminal... hence the
line showing jobs.
But if it is not default to run more than 1 job then why is the other
(emerge) default in place, and blocking the normal output of -v?
Seems like these defaults should all be on the same page.
If emerge is not set to run more than 1 job at a time then the
intrusive `--jobs ???? --load ????' baloney should not be in place by
default either. But I'm sure our developers have much better reasons
than I might dream up for doing it this (seemingly confusing) way.
I'm not really complaining so much as just a little confused as to
what is the reasoning for this change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-07 22:55 [gentoo-user] --jobs Harry Putnam
2011-12-07 23:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-12-07 23:46 ` [gentoo-user] --jobs Harry Putnam
2011-12-07 23:54 ` Paul Hartman
2011-12-08 0:09 ` Harry Putnam [this message]
2011-12-08 0:50 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-12-08 1:12 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-12-08 0:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-12-08 0:03 ` Claudio Roberto França Pereira
2011-12-08 0:05 ` Dale
2011-12-07 23:36 ` [gentoo-user] --jobs Paul Hartman
2011-12-08 0:13 ` [gentoo-user] --jobs Harry Putnam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehwf2abg.fsf@newsguy.com \
--to=reader@newsguy.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox