From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOi1c-0007O6-Oc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97606E05D6; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E58E05D6 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015EA65953 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.927 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.927 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.928, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3voFWNjsZ2d for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAFE64A43 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JOi1K-00076O-T6 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:06 +0000 Received: from adsl-76-193-16-114.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net ([76.193.16.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:06 +0000 Received: from reader by adsl-76-193-16-114.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:06 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: reader@newsguy.com Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Interrogate network for devices Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:24:57 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87d4r3jcty.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87sl01v3hg.fsf@newsguy.com> <87r6fjwym7.fsf@newsguy.com> <87myq7whyj.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-76-193-16-114.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qyR1vKBOFyFov2TRcqzC7MlzXZE= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 87976082-3a4d-4df1-b409-f3fc2f964841 X-Archives-Hash: 94a787bda5dfc78c377c648b9ffc053c Grant Edwards writes: > AFAICT, cable modems that act as bridges are becoming more rare > (DSL bridges were always more rare than cable bridges for some > reason). Comcast has tried to replace my (rented) bridge with > a router a couple times, but I always insist that I want it > replaced with a bridge. So far, they've done it, but I'm > afraid one of these days they aren't going to have any more of > the bridging models available. Assuming I've got it right that this modem is a bridging modem, it was just sent out to me a few days ago so maybe they are still using them here. (Gary Indiana). Scientific Atlanta (Its a division of Cisco) DPC2100R2 -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list