From: gottlieb@nyu.edu
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] did python-r1 improve user experience?
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:41:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bo249r32.fsf@nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761scg9ao.fsf@nyu.edu> (gottlieb@nyu.edu's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:11:59 -0400")
On Thu, Oct 31 2013, gottlieb@nyu.edu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Making things "just work" is complex when trying to juggle 6 or more
>> supported versions/implementations of python.
>
> Indeed.
>
>> We have tried to explain the magic make.conf lines in the Python user guide.
>>
>> https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/python-r1/user-guide.xml
>>
>> We also try to make sure that most users never have to touch
>> PYTHON_TARGETS, etc; the default values provided by your profile are
>> set up to allow *stable* python2.7 and python3.2 to work properly.
>
>> ~arch users are expected to read the docs. ^_^
>
> I am a ~amd64 user and I just read the user-guide. :-)
> I do not see any action items for my system; but do see a large number
> of reinstalls proposed by emerge
>
> I do not change any python variables in make.conf so emerge --info shows
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7"
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2"
>
> a recursive grep -i for python in /etc/portage yields only
> ./package.use/imaging-pillow:5:virtual/python-imaging -python_targets_python3_2
>
> So I basically have the default except for the imaging/pillow business.
>
> I note that update world wants to rebuild a bunch of packages (the
> entire output is below). Some are qt-related others involve
> PYTHON_TARGETS.
>
> Does this mean that I can let the 44 packages / 38 reinstalls update occur
> and expect a running system to result? It is unusual, but I realize not
> unprecedented, to have so many reinstalls and I would like to confirm
> that this is expected.
>
> thanks,
> allan
I realize that I forgot to attach the list of packages emerge wants to
reinstall. So I did the same emerge command (I always use --ask) and
they are *gone*. This I don't understand since I didn't sync inbetween
(ls -lt /usr/portage shows nothing since wednesday).
I though all dependencies, etc are resolved locally so why would it
change from 44 packages with 38 reinstalls to 4 packages with no
reinstalls?
Could someone please set me straight?
thanks,
allan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-01 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 13:13 [gentoo-user] did python-r1 improve user experience? hasufell
2013-10-27 1:30 ` Mike Gilbert
2013-10-27 2:18 ` Walter Dnes
2013-10-27 2:22 ` Bruce Hill
2013-10-27 2:48 ` Mike Gilbert
2013-10-27 3:41 ` William Kenworthy
2013-10-27 19:53 ` Mike Gilbert
2013-11-01 2:11 ` gottlieb
2013-11-01 13:41 ` gottlieb [this message]
2013-11-01 14:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-11-01 15:43 ` gottlieb
2013-11-01 20:17 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-11-01 21:56 ` gottlieb
2013-11-02 1:22 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-11-01 20:30 ` Bruce Hill
2013-10-27 12:03 ` hasufell
2013-10-27 19:43 ` Mike Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bo249r32.fsf@nyu.edu \
--to=gottlieb@nyu.edu \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox