From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDNiZ-0003rr-CD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69CFEE01C6; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1292E01B4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C84564E0A for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.678 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.678 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm3Ma6WK19xq for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D95A64D91 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JDNhp-0003sk-DZ for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:09 +0000 Received: from adsl-75-3-178-22.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net ([75.3.178.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:09 +0000 Received: from reader by adsl-75-3-178-22.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:30:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: reader@newsguy.com Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Update After A Year Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:30:02 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87abnc5kyt.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <200801101257.57487.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20080110111910.78309563@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4786AE11.8090405@gmail.com> <2DAA56E6-E492-4C00-AD3C-C7786D49B3E5@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <7742DA10-C676-4E75-B97B-47532981C61B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <4786E970.6080001@electronsweatshop.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-75-3-178-22.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aeynfdstNhjWWN0CEaDRslxXZeM= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 61049cb8-408e-4e4a-adc0-d56f4886d38e X-Archives-Hash: 79959709dc3f8acf1ee880b00a57b615 Randy Barlow writes: > I will also participate on this thread hijack (but Hal, don't hijack > anymore. It makes your mom angry!) I would actually check more than > just /etc/pam.d/* if you don't find it there because it's possible for > mail servers or web servers to use these things the old way too! Me too but Randy's advice is important. An angry mom can ruin your day... hehe * Your current setup is using one or more of the following modules, * that are not built or supported anymore: pam_pwdb, pam_radius, * pam_timestamp, pam_console If you are in real need for these * modules, please contact the maintainers of PAM through * http://bugs.gentoo.org/ providing information about its use * cases. Please also make sure to read the PAM Upgrade guide at * the following URL: * http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/pam/upgrade-0.99.xml I got that non-sense a while ago too and never did find anything but commented lines. I think the warning may be invoked improperly under some conditions. But others more knowledgeable may disagree. My solution was to uninstall the current pam completely disregarding dependencies, and then emerge the new one. It worked here but please BE CAREFUL I think its possible to cause some problems since we are dealing with things like login. Definitely don't try it remotely. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list