From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GCEEJ-0006NJ-HO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:34:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7DBVvf2024335; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:31:57 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7DBTkMn023614 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:29:47 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BD664902 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29757-04 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D8F648C8 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GCE9y-0003hy-KZ for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:29:38 +0200 Received: from adsl-68-78-64-161.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.78.64.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:29:38 +0200 Received: from reader by adsl-68-78-64-161.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:29:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: reader@newsguy.com Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 06:29:31 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <874pwg50x0.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <871wrl5wtj.fsf@newsguy.com> <87u04h4fn9.fsf@newsguy.com> <61dfbd650608130258p40603527g1a194c37b4bebd0e@mail.gmail.com> <878xls517g.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-68-78-64-161.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wXV1CtuJzdmH/zmUgINip5E74Yg= Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.66 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_REAL_NAME=0.961] X-Spam-Score: -1.66 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 37ca1e3c-36e3-4309-9cd4-2e37974a9feb X-Archives-Hash: 92998d5dcf953bf1fb10eb3217e7e549 reader@newsguy.com writes: > Something here is a bit confusing... I don't understand how renaming > one version of samba to another does much for me. I need the actual > new version installed, not the old version renamed and installed as > the new version. > > Unless something very magic happens at: > # ebuild samba-3.0.23b.ebuild digest > > I'd be installing the old version under a new name.... > > I just am not getting what role the renaming plays I guess. Yikes, I'm not very familiar with what ebuilds are..... Please disregard the above post ... I'm having a bad case of pin-head syndrome this morning.... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list