From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOGRN-00056c-LP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0834E0266; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72537E0266 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F03B643DB for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.532 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.532 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUKcvZ4RhRZn for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6910D64563 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LOGR8-0004Sa-VW for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:26 +0000 Received: from c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.178.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:26 +0000 Received: from reader by c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:02:26 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Harry Putnam Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Restricting Firefox website access Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:02:18 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <874ozxn4cl.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <49bf44f10901071344l3f081b8dmaa6353b41fb59f4@mail.gmail.com> <58965d8a0901071354l76bea08o328361031ff58ac8@mail.gmail.com> <854dca5c0901081257u25c6dee0j7871901221592a95@mail.gmail.com> <49bf44f10901091040t6c1920c4kbd504920e256ac20@mail.gmail.com> <20090110101854.4ed996d1@fraggod.net> <49bf44f10901100948x5ad0087ag93feadefce0385ad@mail.gmail.com> <20090111070536.52dece68@coercion> <49bf44f10901162134o79953e71y393c6a340c398dbe@mail.gmail.com> <3BC0E9C7-E397-43C8-96C1-1798ED64EBCB@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <87d4elnb9m.fsf@newsguy.com> <49bf44f10901170940u697ba542t4eebe4afe6dd8eab@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2jtxnhHGq1EwbNqHmv+SDlKHFiY= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 94bf558e-e422-4415-9e5b-22d30f6bbb89 X-Archives-Hash: b73206221f7bc2d5327cbdc382409fbf Grant writes: >>> But I had expected Squid + module to be the answer, and no-one >>> mentioned it. A couple of clowns mentioned OpenDNS, and DansGuardian >>> was the only serious reply I got, so you might want to look at that, >>> too. >>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/175114 >>> >>> I really should be implementing this internet filtering this weekend. >> >> Did privoxy go out of business... or just not suitable for the need? >> >> I used to use it a few yrs ago but haven't had the need for quite a >> while now. > > What is the advantage of privoxy over squid? Maybe simplicity? Not sure there is one. I ran privoxy through squid. Privoxy talked direct to squid.