From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-179844-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE9F139083
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C26EE0DD3;
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F17EE0DBE
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v66so2325286pgb.5
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=references:user-agent:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id
:mime-version;
bh=ArhpVa6Asqti3xNg4vwB3P38J2bek3+hVr3Z64OQKis=;
b=WefblAqwMrqqA/BlFhe7onml7XyyaMNBPig/BWG7jThwQajZP+daWAqo5KtXACM42x
NKpElRAJCYxKKwFTz0IbT+e7vWMl9jjA5SNEhIu2FDjUKJUMyo/KS/bRAQPsw4KMNZdb
4MoiKWCGjVffX7VV3R7oBqucP3Lab0jtaCvMJog6SmDTJG7DvxLv83zaSJVIgiCMWv0J
BNZtuE4iE8fLWsJ4fdw1owDSWJoofUN6s0ZAKyDNvpNgxwMteGYlF6JbqI+pd/nCPxFA
BcBSq7UfIS+NOBUp4iCq548Z06nV0EP61v6QkTkGrIVQIopG/zHy/NPtG7DA0cNP0J0g
eJrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:subject
:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version;
bh=ArhpVa6Asqti3xNg4vwB3P38J2bek3+hVr3Z64OQKis=;
b=BqVAsI6+vJA5+G0zYkuO/HNIB72kZxL8btC9MZmM384HFtMGu0T4yo03gw37LgX8hl
WYBb9NV17T3pJNWIdqHp3n/lHATV42ETYxZPMUEXmbog8sMZeHcUo7l3PkwVhSwAnJqo
wUjRTRCYjryFste0NpBCAT2ZnAN10PBy/JFnVvoCGxju/rN6tB00d2RQR7sS6uu7O2R2
PAreU2UDSu5tVi9etkUYv9WM6YHvpTyEWMmvzb1Dbcsj5uBZn9EEQSjanm8cKCAPov5c
a6XAeNmYTFh6XMtiRPDeC/+UHroMA3lDXqB85fcbg4fw2+pPmtr/gutVse/6lz9PMNDZ
G6Ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi8ld94C/joiXSoZGwe1tAnmAHEYEdsHCuvHSnw7XpCY9yUHSXd
fyBsrnWeiC9efipMzm8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6YgL2t6ipoHq+6RNTI8JbnLk8EeyfsZ5wNcsGq6jsqSO7vsrxw7OhljTs+EWy6PMd3vMX+iA==
X-Received: by 10.99.121.77 with SMTP id u74mr1363099pgc.254.1504833743820;
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (23.83.238.120.16clouds.com. [23.83.238.120])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y79sm992281pfb.120.2017.09.07.18.22.20
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
References: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com> <CAC=wYCEgbeF2Kdy_v2T2XF25BjYyBJYyM8Bf-KFM6yzHTK3kPg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
From: Danny YUE <sheepduke@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about Firefox 57?
In-reply-to: <CAC=wYCEgbeF2Kdy_v2T2XF25BjYyBJYyM8Bf-KFM6yzHTK3kPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:22:15 +0800
Message-ID: <874lse3ry0.fsf@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Archives-Salt: 7804b9af-d003-45cf-8eec-f4da922ff59b
X-Archives-Hash: 50a21ca192a1b9edac05a76b731ebba4
On 2017-09-08 00:48, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been using FoxyProxy in Firefox for a really long time, until
>> today I found its new version really sucks.
>>
>> Then I read the comment from author who declared that the old version
>> can *only* be used before (roughly) end of 2017 before Firefox 57 and in
>> new version some features must perish.
>>
>
> I am assuming that most actively developed addons will be updated before 57
> drops, so the transition wont be too painful. Is the issue you're having
> with FoxyProxy related to it relying on features that are no longer
> available under the new framework?
Yes. The FoxyProxy author declared that some features are no long
available under the new framework.
I am really depressed about it because I just use that plugin every time
I use Firefox.
> This update will break my favorite extension, Vimperator. I am already
> looking at replacements for Firefox due to this. So far I have found
> qutebrowser which isn't really as featureful.
>
> R0b0t1.
I am using Keysnail, no idea whether or not it will be deprecated.
If the features I want are blocked by the new framework, I'm afraid I
would lock the version (fortunately it's Gentoo) for a long time, until
I find replacement for plugins, or even Firefox...
Danny