From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE9F139083 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C26EE0DD3; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F17EE0DBE for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v66so2325286pgb.5 for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=ArhpVa6Asqti3xNg4vwB3P38J2bek3+hVr3Z64OQKis=; b=WefblAqwMrqqA/BlFhe7onml7XyyaMNBPig/BWG7jThwQajZP+daWAqo5KtXACM42x NKpElRAJCYxKKwFTz0IbT+e7vWMl9jjA5SNEhIu2FDjUKJUMyo/KS/bRAQPsw4KMNZdb 4MoiKWCGjVffX7VV3R7oBqucP3Lab0jtaCvMJog6SmDTJG7DvxLv83zaSJVIgiCMWv0J BNZtuE4iE8fLWsJ4fdw1owDSWJoofUN6s0ZAKyDNvpNgxwMteGYlF6JbqI+pd/nCPxFA BcBSq7UfIS+NOBUp4iCq548Z06nV0EP61v6QkTkGrIVQIopG/zHy/NPtG7DA0cNP0J0g eJrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ArhpVa6Asqti3xNg4vwB3P38J2bek3+hVr3Z64OQKis=; b=BqVAsI6+vJA5+G0zYkuO/HNIB72kZxL8btC9MZmM384HFtMGu0T4yo03gw37LgX8hl WYBb9NV17T3pJNWIdqHp3n/lHATV42ETYxZPMUEXmbog8sMZeHcUo7l3PkwVhSwAnJqo wUjRTRCYjryFste0NpBCAT2ZnAN10PBy/JFnVvoCGxju/rN6tB00d2RQR7sS6uu7O2R2 PAreU2UDSu5tVi9etkUYv9WM6YHvpTyEWMmvzb1Dbcsj5uBZn9EEQSjanm8cKCAPov5c a6XAeNmYTFh6XMtiRPDeC/+UHroMA3lDXqB85fcbg4fw2+pPmtr/gutVse/6lz9PMNDZ G6Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi8ld94C/joiXSoZGwe1tAnmAHEYEdsHCuvHSnw7XpCY9yUHSXd fyBsrnWeiC9efipMzm8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6YgL2t6ipoHq+6RNTI8JbnLk8EeyfsZ5wNcsGq6jsqSO7vsrxw7OhljTs+EWy6PMd3vMX+iA== X-Received: by 10.99.121.77 with SMTP id u74mr1363099pgc.254.1504833743820; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (23.83.238.120.16clouds.com. [23.83.238.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y79sm992281pfb.120.2017.09.07.18.22.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Danny YUE To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about Firefox 57? In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:22:15 +0800 Message-ID: <874lse3ry0.fsf@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 7804b9af-d003-45cf-8eec-f4da922ff59b X-Archives-Hash: 50a21ca192a1b9edac05a76b731ebba4 On 2017-09-08 00:48, Adam Carter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Danny YUE wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have been using FoxyProxy in Firefox for a really long time, until >> today I found its new version really sucks. >> >> Then I read the comment from author who declared that the old version >> can *only* be used before (roughly) end of 2017 before Firefox 57 and in >> new version some features must perish. >> > > I am assuming that most actively developed addons will be updated before 57 > drops, so the transition wont be too painful. Is the issue you're having > with FoxyProxy related to it relying on features that are no longer > available under the new framework? Yes. The FoxyProxy author declared that some features are no long available under the new framework. I am really depressed about it because I just use that plugin every time I use Firefox. > This update will break my favorite extension, Vimperator. I am already > looking at replacements for Firefox due to this. So far I have found > qutebrowser which isn't really as featureful. > > R0b0t1. I am using Keysnail, no idea whether or not it will be deprecated. If the features I want are blocked by the new framework, I'm afraid I would lock the version (fortunately it's Gentoo) for a long time, until I find replacement for plugins, or even Firefox... Danny