From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:39:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8576608.fTLhnHjezo@dell_xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKpSnpJz9NkE+TagPyWEOpJ99iRW_R1qhujBK-TR2PCLsB8J9w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2969 bytes --]
On Monday, 11 December 2017 11:59:03 GMT Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Just my two cents. I will not answer any reply to my little contribution
> > to
> > this thread;
>
> Good. I can't remember any intervention from you that I would miss. Of
> course, I wouldn't dream of telling people how they should think, nor
> would I deny anyone the right to be an activist.
>
> > Enjoy your echo chamber.
>
> Thank you for your contribution, Dr. Yes, we know you're a Dr. We know
> it because:
Crikey! I didn't expect my question to trigger yet another thread of 'systemd
Vs freedom of choice (non-systemd)' arguments. Dr. Canek has been an advocate
of systemd for years now and has posted his views on this topic more than
once. He has tried hard to make gentoo users see the light in the superiority
of systemd and put his arguments across. He has also done a lot of
development work to establish systemd in Gentoo. His views are somewhat
parochial - only those who (can) code have an influence if not a right to
determine the direction of travel - I paraphrase of course. There is truth in
this and anyone can recognise that money can buy developer hours and direct
their development effort.
The facts remain that RHL and their employees have shaped the Linux eco-system
to suit their business interests; spinning predictably and reliably thousands
of identical VMs in data centres. The MSWindows monolithic stack architecture
is something they wanted/needed and this is what they developed.
The fact also remains that binary distros and other development projects
decided to gravitate towards major development areas (cloud and embedded
computing) where commercial interest and development demand has been greater.
Lack of devs and maintainers especially for smaller distros means they decided
to ride on the back of systemd and minimise their own development load. Linux
exists on the desktop too, but this represents a really small percentage of PC
users. Linux desktop users on Gentoo systems is an even smaller number and I
am guessing of an increasingly advanced age demographic.
I am grateful that Gentoo has retained openrc and provides a choice for those
of us who would prefer to not use systemd. I use systemd on a couple of
systems out of necessity/convenience, but I would not like it on my PC
systems. If I wanted this opaque Just Works™ philosophy I would have stayed
with MSWindows or AppleMac, both of which I have used for years and frustrated
me to hell - well MSWindows definitely does. However, for the majority of the
population these OS remain the best suited choice. So, I think we should live
& let live, but as gentoo users at least try to influence gentoo to retain a
freedom of choice most binary distros have walked away from.
Just my 2c's.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-09 9:51 [gentoo-user] Is gnome becoming obligatory? Mick
2017-12-09 10:25 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2017-12-09 10:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-09 10:34 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2017-12-09 10:45 ` Mick
2017-12-09 12:00 ` Jorge Almeida
2017-12-09 23:36 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-10 6:12 ` R0b0t1
2017-12-10 8:54 ` Mick
2017-12-10 8:56 ` Jorge Almeida
2017-12-10 11:55 ` Mart Raudsepp
2017-12-10 12:03 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-10 12:11 ` karl
2017-12-10 21:01 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-10 21:55 ` Jorge Almeida
2017-12-11 3:31 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2017-12-11 4:37 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-11 5:06 ` Mike Gilbert
2017-12-11 5:31 ` R0b0t1
2017-12-11 11:42 ` Corbin
2017-12-11 11:59 ` Jorge Almeida
2017-12-11 12:39 ` Mick [this message]
2017-12-11 13:22 ` mad.scientist.at.large
2017-12-11 13:30 ` Richard Bradfield
2017-12-11 13:48 ` mad.scientist.at.large
[not found] ` <<1512999026.3692893.1201071808.34DC69C6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
[not found] ` <L04pIDW--B-0@tutanota.com-L04pQDl----0>
2017-12-11 14:04 ` mad.scientist.at.large
[not found] ` <<L04pIDW--B-0@tutanota.com-L04pQDl----0>
[not found] ` <L04svRt--3-0@tutanota.com-L04t2Dq ----0>
[not found] ` <L04svRt--3-0@tutanota.com-L04t2Dq----0>
2017-12-11 14:45 ` mad.scientist.at.large
2017-12-11 13:27 ` Kai Peter
2017-12-12 23:23 ` allan gottlieb
2017-12-13 8:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-13 11:04 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 11:46 ` Marc Joliet
2017-12-13 14:05 ` Dale
2017-12-14 7:54 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-15 3:05 ` Kai Krakow
2017-12-15 6:38 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-15 8:47 ` Kai Krakow
2017-12-15 9:28 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-14 16:03 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-15 0:35 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-15 1:12 ` R0b0t1
2017-12-15 1:25 ` Marc Joliet
2017-12-15 7:36 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-09 12:04 ` Taiidan
2017-12-09 12:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-10 9:55 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-10 10:13 ` Alan Mackenzie
2017-12-10 21:02 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-10 23:08 ` Walter Dnes
2017-12-11 15:22 ` Tom H
2017-12-11 19:20 ` Wol's lists
2017-12-11 23:24 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-12 10:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 1:11 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-13 10:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 17:52 ` Walter Dnes
2017-12-14 6:26 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-12 3:51 ` mad.scientist.at.large
2017-12-11 18:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-11 21:03 ` Alan Mackenzie
2017-12-11 22:00 ` Tom H
2017-12-11 22:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-12 12:09 ` Tom H
2017-12-12 12:11 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-12 12:23 ` Arve Barsnes
2017-12-12 7:01 ` J García
2017-12-12 10:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-12 18:55 ` Alan Mackenzie
2017-12-12 20:11 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-13 0:02 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 14:01 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-13 14:06 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2017-12-13 15:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 22:18 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-12 20:11 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 11:34 ` Marc Joliet
2017-12-13 12:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-13 19:37 ` Alan Mackenzie
2017-12-14 7:38 ` Kai Peter
2017-12-14 10:57 ` Marc Joliet
2017-12-14 15:52 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-15 1:16 ` Marc Joliet
2017-12-15 9:50 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-10 10:17 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2017-12-10 10:25 ` Jorge Almeida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8576608.fTLhnHjezo@dell_xps \
--to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox