From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7724D13881E for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4433A21C02A; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFD221C005 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so174464521iof.0 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:28:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:sensitivity:importance:subject:to:from:date :content-type:mime-version; bh=juCUEpIwxXYL5V0T6mUL/Nc651g1Q/s1110bLlZHJUE=; b=rddukuswA7ciR/5uR9r4j/vRQ4YXKExawOV5LxpHXk/S7duX2D2Ab9K+73Ts7qqYIP xF/3AOXX5oLPfxBoXNf5qrwiQ+9/RAvTjrWBheb38zf5mQxvNHtvwtoqodD9tADg/BA2 CZ/m91HfFdi1eXCSCmLfkKzHO6dOtqMf+WCierOSodGKEFCgNeZQxgQX+OxWknJkm70o dHGyDncDwxAXCfl0fKU/wR3XD7jfFa+W9jPA47hQrIUH1mHgzUpam5XZVsxjdQRLfD1c 59sbSoQ0VQeP+EoH7Dxwc4czHsVBrac8SAV7Md5M4q+ZqBKMHXxfd/aN9Nb4pw7Dxc3B CniQ== X-Received: by 10.107.13.75 with SMTP id 72mr18287954ion.75.1443446914372; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.29.195.217 (bda-74-82-80-209.bis6.us.blackberry.com. [74.82.80.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kb10sm8000539igb.4.2015.09.28.06.28.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:28:33 -0700 (PDT) X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:847196818 Message-ID:<847196818-1443446911-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1931205095-@b25.c2.bise6.blackberry> X-Priority: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dynamic deps, wtf are they exactly To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: brettrsears@gmail.com Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:28:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 99893f76-0ad0-45f2-bbef-f4bb7b3dfd95 X-Archives-Hash: 508dbda039caa2bc49e51b2c5626862f ------Original Message------ From: Michael Orlitzky To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org ReplyTo: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dynamic deps, wtf are they exactly Sent: Sep 27, 2015 5:21 PM On 09/27/2015 03:34 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Now it all makes sense, as a bonus I now see why why so many senior devs > are so pedantic about revbumps (they have reason). > > Now that I know what the symptom will be, are bug reports useful? > I don't think most developers are aware of the problem, so if you point out that the lack of a revbump causes pain, many will be glad to know and adjust their behavior. Or, you might just get yelled at. It's one of /those/ issues. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry