From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Klayout and ruby target problem.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 22:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <843863471.0ifERbkFSE@pinacolada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41ac1a54-6b1d-c03d-76bb-12c79b659b9d@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1356 bytes --]
Yeah this is a bit stupid from the ruby side, see below...
> root@fireball / # emerge -auDN world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for sci-electronics/klayout from
> @selected
> ... done!
> Dependency resolution took 4.79 s.
>
>
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sci-electronics/klayout" has unmet
> requirements.
> - sci-electronics/klayout-0.28.5::gentoo USE="" ABI_X86="(64)"
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_11 -python3_10" RUBY_TARGETS="-ruby30"
>
> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
> ruby_targets_ruby30
>
> The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
> exactly-one-of ( python_single_target_python3_10
> python_single_target_python3_11 ) any-of ( ruby_targets_ruby30 )
^ Essentially, it wants "ruby_targets_ruby30" to be enabled, but the default
switched to 3.1.
The ruby eclass misses the feature of the python eclasses that you can build
against "one of the following"...
As you already noticed, 0.28.9 wants "ruby_targets_ruby31" and is thus fine
with the new default.
(And it's also stable since now.)
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-25 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-25 16:19 [gentoo-user] Klayout and ruby target problem Dale
2023-06-25 16:32 ` Arve Barsnes
2023-06-25 17:24 ` Dale
2023-06-25 17:34 ` Arve Barsnes
2023-06-25 20:11 ` Dale
2023-06-25 17:10 ` Matt Connell
2023-06-25 17:34 ` Dale
2023-06-25 20:21 ` Andreas K. Huettel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=843863471.0ifERbkFSE@pinacolada \
--to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox