From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTfxJ-0000n2-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:18:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 320FFE0373; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171EDE0373 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so482605anc.1 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:17:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DjJsnJ5zW5OW5fbrmQB+D5YXEld4+gn6vDZnt1yEXVs=; b=xVu17QA7eHB1xrHqJd4UAggDtb1aZjwhOsqRI2oWIUTlzWulWHJvH7/sX2ZitzjGNT IbyX6TwiRnWXkNn7qnnwvUO58ODi5K4vpSb5A2OhwpDNucwccVKig3pzVsUpK2leBK3D usyfF6DdZ10S4sBxKxY9X+AJ5lGFHQRKsSK4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DRM+mRAqIRSD4cu7gRNCaihRJD6W08af3SJZA6jjrF1gsHUFctRDrxcpwvd6lCyW0A tcJHrVV10FbNptJMU6vLJY3pVEPxOsWvo3BrpiSDtvGN+I0v3u/01aYQZtJFv8MHV2yO NILOIf/Eh1QG3V6QSySW6jmj7Neizh1qPcto0= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.96.10 with SMTP id t10mr272891anb.32.1233508679731; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:17:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200902011707.37794.ddjones@riddlemaster.org> References: <200902011538.03374.ddjones@riddlemaster.org> <84250c9c0902010740j6ca4a00epff0f18e1c8e7e693@mail.gmail.com> <200902011707.37794.ddjones@riddlemaster.org> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:17:59 -0200 Message-ID: <84250c9c0902010917r27304715x1a8dd4040a0596bc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5 From: Norberto Bensa To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 54ad9c66-9112-4f05-b59b-08b44339a4e8 X-Archives-Hash: 79070ddf671968acc50cd43aa6e0bfc8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones > wrote: >> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm >> > getting the following: >> >> You'll need kde-3.5.10 (or kdebase-startkde at least) >> >> Look in the archives, a similar question was posted a few days ago. > > Thanks for your response. I did search the archives and did not find anything > relevant. I saw and read a thread where a block was occurring: > > <=kde-base/kdebase-startkde-3.5.10" is blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0 > > It wasn't clear to me that this was the same problem, since that block > referenced a 3.5.10 package and mine referenced a 3.5.9 package. since the block is: <=kde-base/kdebase-startkde-3.5.10" is blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0 and 3.5.9 <= 3.5.10, then yes, the mail applies to you You'll need kdebase-startkde > 3.5.10 (3.5.10-r5 is available in portage) > However, upgrading to 3.5.10 raises another issue. For 3.5, I didn't install > the meta package, I installed the KDE base package: Uhm... Do you mean monolitich (base) vs. modules (meta)? > 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE > package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10? (Without, > that is, manually unblocking lots and lots of packages.) Can I simply > install the meta package over the base package or will that create blocks or > other issues? I don't know. Perhaps another user can answer that question. I moved to modules as soon as it was made available. Regards, Norberto