From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0611389FE for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D09EAE08B0; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63154E089E for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.134] (helo=smtp3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkCtV-0006c6-P5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkCtV-0001p8-G5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Received: from andromeda.localnet (unknown [10.20.13.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCF274B for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:08:52 +0100 (CET) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternative kernels Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:09:26 +0100 Message-ID: <8373843.QKcfWZa5E2@andromeda> Organization: Antarean User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54536D16.6090401@libertytrek.org> References: <5707050.LYlfBLMIFp@andromeda> <54536D16.6090401@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Ziggo-spambar: --- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -3.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_40=-0.001,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: ca1ba825-9a87-4fc4-9bfb-1efc3521052e X-Archives-Hash: ea624fddf7243dec4660b4ea9522be03 On Friday, October 31, 2014 07:05:58 AM Tanstaafl wrote: > On 10/31/2014 3:11 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Systemd is, in my opinion, suffering from the same feature-creep as Grub2 > > does. Grub1 was faster, because it was smaller. But it isn't working > > propery anymore and Grub2 does its job > > Eh?? Grub1 doesn't work properly any more? Please, also for future reference, unless stated otherwise, most people, including me, tend to forget to add "for me", "on my system(s)" or similar to statements like this. > News to me, and my system that is still using it (properly as far as I > can tell)... I've got a few systems where grub1 doesn't work. This is more likely caused by some changes in used filesystems instead of any other cause. If I really wanted to, I might get it to work, but I don't see the point in spending time on this. Grub starts the boot process and then, afaik, disappears. Which is sufficient for me. -- Joost