From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED93158086 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EFB42BC0C4; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD452BC0B6 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id d3so19820217wrh.8 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 16:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ryY22p4MD2RYwJmQtcGHF0bSMUCSR266RqQV0nxBYyY=; b=ePrOK+951Z4HL0LnHea+tgrqErziTc9r8TQv137xc/N0yx2jNZRu6TW/+VkHE/uq2l o9CodY2H4ecf+G+MHDkbLhbQumM6aHuEavp1hmCdZ03NJV0xPoxrL8lfpRTfUOEKwuIk XrJ8uxAc2ZGP5g9dWx4gMaNQRXtKe2kqCpHPDU/4kl3Drk1Jt5kfpnpK3Vu6hEjTd700 WtD9B1OHXXFugcRjvMdep51sdXIDwtNbuS1J4l2xo+SlxfH1VEGPZqRcM6ScF6TqG7RT BKoE38GLEc4B+uPCKZ2R7j5SUOZ0RXFc4ZYvRMtzhgkHNJp1ZzU7bnhEZdu8g2PEUaQV tRJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ryY22p4MD2RYwJmQtcGHF0bSMUCSR266RqQV0nxBYyY=; b=6L9QoVS1ddB+f9P8aDSOTcZsBlFgGnd4kPsGYgsyRZU/qXZPkG4rwlBNy0+LJRI1JR 4YRDwQ28hl38HKS7T78/6SHHHvuM34JL91onlS30PwyTnl6D6C8Pa/50ZVbLeq2S0HwS B5LeRZ5KEPMLU7kkT04CFFyeJO1hT/YZ3RZWqdv1bzuYjWJd91t13Oc7gRmihERUQ3nE Anw3gOaegqOfl0UUZ3pNoEJbNhEaKoj/6I4obhqTMOcFHXAuAlBBZgf4a7SOuit5uec0 26vmrMumHt7ReItZh9kkOgfE3oNuIaT9I3Tsp0IFnRT2J6ZkpVgu5NV8SoCry9jZEnv1 N2oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bbbfv1l4riHo6OUf2AJ7H0HtuWZ9u1Dc+5YL1fRTPa4Ds0rGB QJKXsKdkDIZg1+eIqm2jzQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVlp17JKaV4V3R/tDOi/iYgrDDskh/tQeCToZZ5CFh70uv+x5nQskoBHEUPORK/uQXwJl6BQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef52:: with SMTP id c18mr65593583wrp.162.1636240708886; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 16:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (84-75-70-121.dclient.hispeed.ch. [84.75.70.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm9369002wmq.31.2021.11.06.16.18.28 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Nov 2021 16:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f8e891-d479-b8d9-03f7-65f6f3eef6a3@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 00:18:27 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] wireplumber for pipewire 0.3.39 startup problems Content-Language: de-DE To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <246193f7-573e-023c-7a8c-36248ac83e3f@googlemail.com> From: Tamer Higazi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 39285331-cfda-4de8-a283-ecbd70d6357d X-Archives-Hash: 20dd8cd34ef98f16b5c83126223ac071 Dear Jack, Yes, you are right. It is in fact the same. It is the package wireplumber: media-video/wireplumber-0.4.4:0/0.4::gentoo  USE="systemd (-elogind) -test" LUA_SINGLE_TARGET="lua5-4 -lua5-3" 0 KiB that is causing me headache. Any ideas ? best, Tamer Am 11/6/21 um 23:54 schrieb Jack: > On 2021.11.06 18:00, Tamer Higazi wrote: >> Hi people, >> >> I got a problem getting "wireplumper" for pipewire to run. >> >> tamer@tux ~ $ systemctl --user status wireplumber.service >> >> tells me that it failed to start >> >> × wireplumber.service - Multimedia Service Session Manager >>      Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/user/wireplumber.service; >> enabled; vendor preset: enabled) >>      Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2021-11-06 22:46:02 >> CET; 2min 53s ago >>     Process: 1380 ExecStart=/usr/bin/wireplumber (code=exited, >> status=70) >>    Main PID: 1380 (code=exited, status=70) >> >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: wireplumber.service: Failed with >> result 'exit-code'. >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: wireplumber.service: Scheduled >> restart job, restart counter is at 5. >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: Stopped Multimedia Service Session >> Manager. >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: wireplumber.service: Start request >> repeated too quickly. >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: wireplumber.service: Failed with >> result 'exit-code'. >> Nov 06 22:46:02 tux systemd[1244]: Failed to start Multimedia Service >> Session Manager. >> >> Executing "wireplumper" gives out an error that it failed to start >> "wireplumper": >> >> tamer@tux ~ $ /usr/bin/wireplumber >> failed to start systemd logind monitor: -2 (No such file or directory) >> M 22:46:16.429961        wireplumber >> ../wireplumber-0.4.4/src/main.c:328:on_disconnected: disconnected >> from pipewire >> >> >> by the way, according the pipewire gentoo guide, the ~/.xinitrc file >> should look like this: >> >> if which dbus-launch >/dev/null && test -z >> "$DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS"; then >>        eval `dbus-launch --sh-syntax --exit-with-session` >> fi >> >> /usr/bin/gentoo-pipewire-launcher >> >> ...but "/usr/bin/gentoo-pipewire-launcher" simply does not exist ... >> >> >> pipewire is on 0.3.39: >> >> tamer@tux ~ $ LANG=C pactl info | grep "Server Name" >> Server Name: PulseAudio (on PipeWire 0.3.39) >> >> >> emerge --info: >> https://pastebin.com/raw/Ya6LmipC >> >> (emerge -uDN @world) had been executed today .... > > Your post has a mix of "wireplumper" and "wireplumber".  Hopefully > there is just a repeated typo, and in fact, all should be the same? >