From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07DD91382C5 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9C75E09BF; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 15:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qv1-f50.google.com (mail-qv1-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26496E09A6 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 15:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qv1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x16so544411qvr.3 for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:05:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=D8rrdxYhXJVcWIrkUGVh3A0M87DMmMZx3kDJcZlzCPk=; b=KGDaYNXjn/ZXR/9U6eFd3YFdqOjGUTCiTSB10fJCzGJjoApB3tYQqWczTHn43Hm16v Os7Pwfe734qIFjq6/+2dW9PPtzoAGKmx07Pn12GQgNqp8RZBSCMzJVgWhxN/4IhPmoJb xzRYs/R9iGKQmHAoukMqIK/rPtHhinFmWDnZvEIh5BeJJ69s3OL6eYmMv/flDAtb0wFM 45bgfNoQwWN8U/xHOTRT/bHaN/XPeXq+XdOTyDVltdZf0Jky2lnXnC1d3A1y5KvH58Pr lLMqmxSEgle/EmxHYsGUBN20FY26GhHtXvyaRKaKpMOlleO4q16F+gdqhDcN/LTC6bNG 2kvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532n7lxqv2wvPrt6Chawway+yVG3SXopOhar/9a4UQeGSs7cw2jQ qFBUOwAdgBdGCs6PErhhUrtQg7Bfu/iX0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQ1npSZuqAFyeNfgVsDSxQ3Ljuu7fuLE6O4SF4h9WLPYskx03QmHbcv/1H2jAhSZ60XF/4kA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1327:: with SMTP id c7mr15078061qvv.64.1591455932212; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (c-76-23-130-96.hsd1.ct.comcast.net. [76.23.130.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l188sm2366709qke.127.2020.06.06.08.05.31 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypting a hard drive's data. Best method. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <12F6F6AC-B646-4638-8349-BD5B9DB51B5E@antarean.org> From: Jack Message-ID: <7d14a3aa-30b2-0b95-5892-4940a6a72b74@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:05:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US-large X-Archives-Salt: c7f713f5-9c36-4e67-8782-1d9d5349fbe0 X-Archives-Hash: 619b6a67c00f52d1b5091bf496d08b25 On 6/6/20 10:10 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > One of the problems with drive-managed SMR is that it can seem to be > ok when you're just doing light duty access, and then when one of your > other drives fails and you're doing a zfs resilver the SMR drive > starts performing an order of magnitude or more worse and you find > yourself painted in to a corner. The first time I read that, I saw "....and you find yourself pained into a corner."  I suppose that's also true.