* [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
@ 2006-07-12 19:15 darren kirby
2006-07-12 20:01 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: darren kirby @ 2006-07-12 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]
Hello all,
I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem to be
missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that looks
decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were set as
courier which looks terrible.
Does anyone know where to get this font back? I did a google but it did not
help.
Thanks for consideration,
-d
--
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-12 19:15 [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade darren kirby
@ 2006-07-12 20:01 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-12 21:30 ` darren kirby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2006-07-12 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
darren kirby wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem to be
> missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that looks
> decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were set as
> courier which looks terrible.
>
> Does anyone know where to get this font back? I did a google but it did not
> help.
>
> Thanks for consideration,
> -d
Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
Thanks,
Donnie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-12 20:01 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2006-07-12 21:30 ` darren kirby
2006-07-12 21:50 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: darren kirby @ 2006-07-12 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]
quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
> darren kirby wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
> > to be missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that
> > looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were
> > set as courier which looks terrible.
> >
> > Does anyone know where to get this font back? I did a google but it did
> > not help.
> >
> > Thanks for consideration,
> > -d
>
> Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
The adobe fonts were already installed (no 10 pitch) and I installed the IBM
fonts and it was not there either. However, "Courier [IBM]" seems to look
fine, and will be suitable.
I would still like to know where the 10 pitch is if anybody knows...
> Thanks,
> Donnie
And thanks,
-d
--
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-12 21:30 ` darren kirby
@ 2006-07-12 21:50 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-13 1:41 ` Allan Gottlieb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2006-07-12 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1050 bytes --]
darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
>> darren kirby wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
>>> to be missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that
>>> looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were
>>> set as courier which looks terrible.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know where to get this font back? I did a google but it did
>>> not help.
>>>
>>> Thanks for consideration,
>>> -d
>> Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
>
> The adobe fonts were already installed (no 10 pitch) and I installed the IBM
> fonts and it was not there either. However, "Courier [IBM]" seems to look
> fine, and will be suitable.
>
> I would still like to know where the 10 pitch is if anybody knows...
Oh, do you not have ttf-bitstream-vera installed? It looks like I've got
bitstream fonts providing it, maybe font-bitstream-type1 if you can't
get it from the other.
Thanks,
Donnie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-12 21:50 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2006-07-13 1:41 ` Allan Gottlieb
2006-07-13 2:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Allan Gottlieb @ 2006-07-13 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
At Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:11 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> darren kirby wrote:
>> quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
>>> Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
>>
>> The adobe fonts were already installed (no 10 pitch) and I installed the IBM
>> fonts and it was not there either. However, "Courier [IBM]" seems to look
>> fine, and will be suitable.
>>
>> I would still like to know where the 10 pitch is if anybody knows...
>
> Oh, do you not have ttf-bitstream-vera installed? It looks like I've got
> bitstream fonts providing it, maybe font-bitstream-type1 if you can't
> get it from the other.
(Donnie, Thanks for all your informative replies on the Xorg issues.)
I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at
least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and
font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend
unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for
stabilization? I should add that I am not at all hurting with just
the (stable) fonts that I do have installed.
thanks again,
allan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-13 1:41 ` Allan Gottlieb
@ 2006-07-13 2:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-13 9:39 ` Alan E. Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2006-07-13 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at
> least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and
> font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend
> unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for
> stabilization? I should add that I am not at all hurting with just
> the (stable) fonts that I do have installed.
I've mentioned this elsewhere, but the idea is that we're trying to
figure out which programs, fonts, etc people really use and need. If you
actually use something (not just install it and never use the fonts or
whatever), please file a bug requesting that it be stabled.
Thanks,
Donnie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade
2006-07-13 2:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2006-07-13 9:39 ` Alan E. Davis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alan E. Davis @ 2006-07-13 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
I haven't checked lately, but when I upgraded to modular Xorg, the
following font package was missing:
media-fonts/font-schumacher-misc
I was unable to run a program I'd compiled myself---xtide.
Alan Davis
On 7/13/06, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at
> > least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and
> > font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend
> > unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for
> > stabilization? I should add that I am not at all hurting with just
> > the (stable) fonts that I do have installed.
>
> I've mentioned this elsewhere, but the idea is that we're trying to
> figure out which programs, fonts, etc people really use and need. If you
> actually use something (not just install it and never use the fonts or
> whatever), please file a bug requesting that it be stabled.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
>
>
>
--
Alan Davis, Kagman High School, Saipan lngndvs@gmail.com 1-670-256-2043
I consider that the golden rule requires that if I like a program I
must share it with other people who like it.
--------Richard Stallman
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-13 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-12 19:15 [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade darren kirby
2006-07-12 20:01 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-12 21:30 ` darren kirby
2006-07-12 21:50 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-13 1:41 ` Allan Gottlieb
2006-07-13 2:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-13 9:39 ` Alan E. Davis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox