From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE32138CE9 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 833DEE081D; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay115.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay115.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.142]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193E5E07F2 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:53:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=wcGNbXEvJ1+lRvjKRe8ww5ZIB0ZoB9oB8wjQofnwvDA= c=1 sm=2 a=NimUR-UY4PkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=3XvQ7vMgD8HSVXLP3ZsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BwBgC5QH1V/0tKsFtcgxCBM8VgAoEdPRABAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBBDocMwsYLhApHhmIMwG5R49Vi0SEUzoWhBcFk1ujUiZjgSgcgVQ8MYJHAQEB Received: from 75.74-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO numa-be.localdomain) ([91.176.74.75]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2015 10:53:36 +0200 Received: from numa-be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa-be.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346EA9C09DA for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:53:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:53:36 +0200 From: Helmut Jarausch Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Backgammon (GNU) anybody To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: In-Reply-To: (from stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk on Sat Jun 13 17:42:10 2015) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.5.2-2-g8a4db2d Message-Id: <7ZPZMl7N3so54cL7R2c5lD@Bg7K9O55tOJHPc95JkXRk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a0ee3ea9-73c3-4e55-a544-eaaaed08c8ff X-Archives-Hash: 6a004b1180c7eeac4edf66809154158e On 06/13/2015 05:42:10 PM, Stroller wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 12 June 2015, at 5:03 pm, Helmut Jarausch > wrote: > > On 06/11/2015 09:32:23 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >=20 > >> I got curious and just did "emerge -av gnubg". It compiled and > >> installed fine, and it seems to work. =20 > >=20 > > Many thanks, it turnt out to be a strange problem. > >=20 > > When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O2, gnubg goes into a tight loop > within memset=20 > > even before function main is entered. > >=20 > > When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O1, gnubg gets a segment fault > from within memset=20 > > even before function main is entered. > >=20 > > When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O0, it works just fine. > >=20 > > Stepping back to gcc-4.9.2 it succeeds even when compiled with -O2. > >=20 > > So, it looks like a compiler error of gcc-5.1.0 >=20 > You should report this upstream. To gcc, I think? >=20 As I found out, it has been fixed already. Not for gcc-5.1 but with a recen= t snapshot of gcc-5 as well as gcc-6. =