From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-89890-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LSSOP-0001No-8n
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:36:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDF6AE02D6;
	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.156])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6503E02D6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so2959051ywm.46
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:36:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=LEznfAiqcWZIowgk6moecWN9d9jcl2siP+ZTjP3hd1A=;
        b=JpJ4ekD0JjD4YUr3asSH4ueUEC8XaHENDdp7Lm1A/Nsj0rrC8IDNRL/juuxyFv7U/t
         YZYgvaWOsoVPBeiAQLwZJa9xx+jJ1NwDcXY8aiZBpcqDRMbohAh3++jvKlCKXbhwLkeO
         p7bYXQX3tU+jgCER78+lpUCNhwYrun/wGmuXI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=eCP+0xuC2GDmj2ByeN65YrHgp5NE4K7g7TDv1bO4G9SMza1RA1vPB/S9Wi2Mfy5PBV
         D05FeNMJQxo015gUlRWjLrII+1zVKfPjXobnafEMdWKmfsbRSdsUDzy8m6QRFPaE+46k
         Yo/0K8UHVDlnJBFaaCk7cwGKD3LfNkcvAHIqg=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.112.4 with SMTP id p4mr363520ybm.82.1233218214464; Thu, 29 
	Jan 2009 00:36:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b220ab930901290003q3e29ad2cnb2ad99f8049d5b70@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b220ab930901281100t2f65060r3380bda7dc49a9ac@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200901290837.52563.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
	 <b220ab930901290003q3e29ad2cnb2ad99f8049d5b70@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:36:54 +0200
Message-ID: <79e3aefb0901290036u68fbc789hdf7e0669143693a2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2: Emerge of ksysguard and ksmserver failed
From: Dirk Uys <dirkcuys@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 3d9391ab-0f6c-42bf-b2c2-e0f402d51362
X-Archives-Hash: 016acbe9d713e64c5a95950d0a70322f

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Tomas Linhart <tomas.linhart@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/1/29 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>:
>>
>> re-emerge the qt packages in the right order.
>> then emerge kdelibs again, then the rest. Stuff like this happens when qt is
>> updated after kdelibs is built against it.
>>
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I not at my box just now so I will try that later today. But I have
> re-emerge all qt packages and also kdelibs yesterday but I am not sure
> in which order...
> Before I start again - what is "the right order" for emerging the qt packages?
>
> Tomas

I would assume that "the right order" is to emerge all the qt
libraries, and then kdelibs?

Regards
Dirk