From: "Budd, Tracy" <Tracy.Budd@solers.com>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:27:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78CC38B659D30A439315C39FA5257AAFB511D9@ava-es3.solers.local> (raw)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Rout
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
> Derek Tracy wrote:
>
> > Part way through the online handbook I noticed that they
> standardized
> > the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers
> thought it was
> > best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot.
>
> I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I
> read the handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and
> the 2005.1 handbook stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I
> have never done an instal on other architectures).
>
> Now, like you, I read this in the Handbook:
>
> "Make sure you download a stage3 tarball - installations
> using a stage1 or stage2 tarball are not supported anymore."
>
> WTF? When did this happen?
>
> --
> Nick Rout
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
This one caught me off guard as well. I am used to installing from a
stage 1 tarball. When I recently installed to my new AMD64 machine, I
was surprised to see this was no longer covered in the handbook. It was
easily fixed with an emerge system though.
-tracy
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78CC38B659D30A439315C39FA5257AAFB511D9@ava-es3.solers.local \
--to=tracy.budd@solers.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox