From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZQo4-0003sL-2t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:01:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C15B1C1F7; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8731C1F7 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so359397ewy.40 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=cyzjU25KtGVVpkBGcxfdkesBBHqa3qsQHzkWGtrEzMk=; b=GTBnr0dknsgyS7VAuFuTt603D/SRCUSyJAXLHFH6BDPEaz27xabbaE6MHOt+dSJvXh 9HrwfNGbs663nFuAcQBpeQCKMWHimQ2tz0FEC3MYDN3dxBfbwMoTwsL8smodKl/oQ2aA o5ZFckqagUywcyjgCTEGKmrIjQUCZks7Ondcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=APUvitvaGhJ613U7pBckYVDmpJHWVWZNzGXE4ybZX7ftrV4a+z2JuoM2y4LSOe5FEw ZHCf9MUSDJLG2M4r3NUguPDRtUwNCvIz4roc4Ujr6n8k9Cafjd0+1NeU7DmS/1I2a0Mz /U+G3pjwCFXSscv4w2WTfvDJOpV4bgg2lnm8c= Received: by 10.14.16.29 with SMTP id g29mr760979eeg.236.1308762006561; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b19sm616660eec.22.2011.06.22.10.00.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:59:01 +0200 Message-ID: <7769776.ParNjgXHIv@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4E02189A.90908@darkmetatron.de> References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <15413157.QhsxscBRlY@nazgul> <4E02189A.90908@darkmetatron.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cef05fce7fde037e4a1eca71520ad16b On Wednesday 22 June 2011 18:30:18 Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler did opine thus= ly: > Am 22.06.2011 17:31, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 15:44:40 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: > >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:41:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> It is unset here (well, it's not set, actually - same thing) > >>=20 > >> autounmask is set by default, you need to explicitly set it to > >> off. > >=20 > > So, > >=20 > > is it invisibly on then? I don't have it in make.conf and it's > > not in >=20 > > FEATURES: > It is not a FEATURE its a default option >=20 > NOTE: This --autounmask behavior can be disabled by setting > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--autounmask=3Dn" in make.conf. ahhhhhhhhhhhh, now that makes sense. Thanks! --=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com