From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337A21382C5 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0DBBE0A03; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A289E09E1 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jjnGg-0004Nj-Qz for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:15:02 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "masked by: EAPI 7" trying up update "portage" - how to proceed Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:15:02 +0100 Message-ID: <7767620.T7Z3S40VBb@peak> In-Reply-To: <7111842.EvYhyI6sBW@lenovo.localdomain> References: <9ed9c401-7066-9c6d-8ce4-2ee94a1b903e@web.de> <21dfc4e9-5fbf-4128-66c5-f1a58bb3bf43@web.de> <7111842.EvYhyI6sBW@lenovo.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 795540a1-8d7d-4c05-b370-a7cdb6df9d35 X-Archives-Hash: fd2ab7005cc2d055fb0f05e8ff2cf14e On Friday, 12 June 2020 15:52:50 BST Michael wrote: > On Friday, 12 June 2020 15:44:05 BST n952162 wrote: > > And, BTW, is there a reason to do @system if that's a subset of @world? > > To rebuild with the latest gcc and work through any convoluted dependencies > cutting across into world. It may not add anything, but other than > rebuilding a few packages I don't think it will hurt. Here's the pair of scripts I use when upgrading gcc: $ cat /usr/local/bin/ejsys #!/bin/bash echo && echo "Be sure to have upgraded gcc and switched to the new version!" && echo echo "Mounting /boot for intel-microcode to install." && echo mount /boot emerge $@ -1 --jobs libtool && emerge $@ -1 --jobs llvm clang wxGTK &&\ emerge $@ --jobs --keep-going --nospinner @system linux-firmware intel- microcode \ --exclude="gcc libtool llvm clang wxGTK" $ cat /usr/local/bin/ejeworld #!/bin/bash emerge -1 --jobs --load-average=48 --keep-going --nospinner $@ \ -e @apps @base @core @plasma @utils @xorg @world \ --exclude="$(cat ~/system.pkgs) linux-firmware intel-microcode \ libtool llvm clang wxGTK gentoo-sources" First I run ejsys, then I compile a new kernel and boot it, then I run ejeworld. The precise choice of packages to emerge with @system may differ between systems. HTH. -- Regards, Peter.