From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE0D1381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DD68E09A1; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0131.smtp25.com (mail0131.smtp25.com [75.126.84.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A126E098A for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (d-out-001.smtp25.com [67.228.158.174] (may be forged)) by d-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r4CBaokb024021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 07:36:50 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4CBaoMI007675 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 07:36:50 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild acting strangely In-reply-to: <518F7DD0.5020404@gentoo.org> References: <20003.1368341444@ccs.covici.com> <20130512110941.1e174cef@digimed.co.uk> <3210.1368358198@ccs.covici.com> <518F7DD0.5020404@gentoo.org> Comments: In-reply-to Samuli Suominen message dated "Sun, 12 May 2013 14:32:32 +0300." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.2 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 07:36:50 -0400 Message-ID: <7674.1368358610@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-r4CBaokb024021 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 67fc4fc7-0861-48ec-95e9-7d7f648e7529 X-Archives-Hash: 634203cdc0135ef734336e40c064ad06 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 12/05/13 14:29, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried > >>> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following: > >> > >> I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's > >> generally rock solid for me. > > Buy unstable I meant ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64" > > Never, ever add both ~amd64 and ~x86 at the same time in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. > > It's either ~amd64 or ~x86, but not BOTH. > > Otherwise you risk breaking the system as ebuilds make assumptions > based on keywords. OK, thanks, I will do that. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com