* [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked?
@ 2006-11-19 5:28 Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 5:41 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir G. Ivanovic @ 2006-11-19 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo User List; +Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool
When I run 'emerge -Davu world' I get this message (and the emerge
fails):
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "gnome-base/gnome-libs" have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
your request:
- gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 (masked by: package.mask)
# Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@gentoo.org> (16 Nov 2006)
# GNOME 1.x Removal Mask (15 Dec 2006)
I assume that this means gnome-libs-1.4.2 is going to be removed in one
month. but lots of packages directly depend on gnome-libs:
# equery depends gnome-base/gnome-libs
[ Searching for packages depending on gnome-base/gnome-libs... ]
x11-misc/gtkdiff-1.8.0-r2
gnome-base/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r4
gnome-base/gnome-print-0.37
gnome-base/libglade-0.17-r6
app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6
gnome-extra/guppi-0.40.3-r3
dev-perl/gtk-perl-glade-0.7008-r1
dev-perl/gtk-perl-0.7009-r2
media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-r5
dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.11-r1
Some of these packages have alternate version, what about the others?
Have those packages been made instantly obsolete? What exactl are users
supposed to do? I could find no guidance on the official Gentoo site,
nor on the Gentoo Wiki.
--- Vladimir
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked?
2006-11-19 5:28 [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
@ 2006-11-19 5:41 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir G. Ivanovic @ 2006-11-19 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool
[Subject corrected to "gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked?]
--- Vladimir
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 21:28 -0800, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> When I run 'emerge -Davu world' I get this message (and the emerge
> fails):
>
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "gnome-base/gnome-libs" have
> been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
> your request:
> - gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 (masked by: package.mask)
> # Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@gentoo.org> (16 Nov 2006)
> # GNOME 1.x Removal Mask (15 Dec 2006)
>
> I assume that this means gnome-libs-1.4.2 is going to be removed in one
> month. but lots of packages directly depend on gnome-libs:
>
> # equery depends gnome-base/gnome-libs
> [ Searching for packages depending on gnome-base/gnome-libs... ]
> x11-misc/gtkdiff-1.8.0-r2
> gnome-base/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r4
> gnome-base/gnome-print-0.37
> gnome-base/libglade-0.17-r6
> app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6
> gnome-extra/guppi-0.40.3-r3
> dev-perl/gtk-perl-glade-0.7008-r1
> dev-perl/gtk-perl-0.7009-r2
> media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-r5
> dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.11-r1
>
> Some of these packages have alternate version, what about the others?
> Have those packages been made instantly obsolete? What exactl are users
> supposed to do? I could find no guidance on the official Gentoo site,
> nor on the Gentoo Wiki.
>
> --- Vladimir
>
> --
> Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net>
>
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked?
2006-11-19 5:28 [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 5:41 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
@ 2006-11-19 7:36 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 7:38 ` Richard Fish
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-11-19 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/18/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net> wrote:
> I assume that this means gnome-libs-1.4.2 is going to be removed in one
> month. but lots of packages directly depend on gnome-libs:
Yes, all old gnome and gnome-dependant things are going away as they
are unmaintained.
> # equery depends gnome-base/gnome-libs
equery depends is (nearly) useless.
> [ Searching for packages depending on gnome-base/gnome-libs... ]
> x11-misc/gtkdiff-1.8.0-r2
This hasn't seen an update in 5 years. Are you actually using this?
If so, what does "ldd `which gtkdiff`" report? It might be a mistake
and might actually depend on gtk2. But given it's age, I sort of
doubt this. If it does depend on gtk1, well, there are several other
graphical diff utilities in portage. "emerge --searchdesc" or "eix
-S" are your friends here.
> gnome-base/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r4
> gnome-base/gnome-print-0.37
> gnome-base/libglade-0.17-r6
> media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-r5
Old gnome stuff...do you actually use these, and if so, why haven't
you upgraded to the current version of gnome?
> app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6
Just recompile this without the gnome USE flag. From
/usr/portage/app-misc/gfontview/ChangeLog:
17 Nov 2006; Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@gentoo.org>
gfontview-0.5.0-r6.ebuild:
Dropping gnome useflag for gnome-1.x removal
> gnome-extra/guppi-0.40.3-r3
Lots of other plotting packages in portage.
> dev-perl/gtk-perl-glade-0.7008-r1
> dev-perl/gtk-perl-0.7009-r2
Do you actually use these, or are they installed as some other
dependancy? Anyway, gtk2-perl and gtk2-gladexml exist for gtk2
applications.
> dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.11-r1
This can just be remerged as well:
17 Nov 2006; Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@gentoo.org> unixODBC-2.2.6.ebuild,
unixODBC-2.2.6-r1.ebuild, unixODBC-2.2.8.ebuild, unixODBC-2.2.11.ebuild,
unixODBC-2.2.11-r1.ebuild:
Dropping gnome useflag for gnome-1.x removal
Same response as gtkdiff. Do you actually use them? If not, why do you care?
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked?
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
@ 2006-11-19 7:38 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 9:28 ` Philip Webb
2006-11-19 17:47 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-11-19 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/19/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@asmallpond.org> wrote:
> Same response as gtkdiff. Do you actually use them? If not, why do you care?
Apologies for the out-of-context line that should have been removed
before I clicked send. Call it a case of "email Tourrettes".
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked?
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
2006-11-19 7:38 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-11-19 9:28 ` Philip Webb
2006-11-19 18:27 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 17:47 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Philip Webb @ 2006-11-19 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
061119 Richard Fish wrote:
> On 11/18/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net> wrote:
>> I assume gnome-libs-1.4.2 is going to be removed in one month,
>> but lots of packages directly depend on gnome-libs:
>> app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6
> Just recompile this without the gnome USE flag.
That didn't work for me: it still demands the '1' versions of Glib & Gtk+ ,
tho' not Gnome-libs. The same for Dillo.
Does anyone know whether these other two are going away sometime too ?
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@chass.utoronto.ca
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked?
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
2006-11-19 7:38 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 9:28 ` Philip Webb
@ 2006-11-19 17:47 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 18:20 ` Richard Fish
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir G. Ivanovic @ 2006-11-19 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 00:36 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> Do you actually use them? If not, why do you care?
No and maybe. I don't use gtkdiff, so I obviously don't care, but a lot
of the packages contain libraries. I don't know if I use them or not. Is
there an automated way of dealing with the package removal of
gnome-libs? Or is every user expected to go through the list of package
dependencies (direct and indirect), examine them, and make a decision
for each package?
--- Vladimir
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked?
2006-11-19 17:47 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
@ 2006-11-19 18:20 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-11-19 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Saleem Abdulrasool
On 11/19/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net> wrote:
> No and maybe. I don't use gtkdiff, so I obviously don't care, but a lot
> of the packages contain libraries. I don't know if I use them or not.
Are these listed in your world (/var/lib/portage/world) file? If so,
remove them, do an "emerge -Nuv world". After that, emerge --depclean
--pretend will show you things that are not needed anymore. And of
course, --pretend --tree is the best way of determining what wants to
pull in certain libraries. So you can remove them, and run emerge -v
--pretend --tree world to determine what is pulling in these things.
> Or is every user expected to go through the list of package dependencies
> (direct and indirect), examine them, and make a decision for each package?
emerge --depclean can be used to clean out unneeded libraries, but
that won't work if your world file is polluted with a bunch of
unnecessary things. So in that case, yeah, you will have to things
"manually".
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked?
2006-11-19 9:28 ` Philip Webb
@ 2006-11-19 18:27 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-11-19 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/19/06, Philip Webb <purslow@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 061119 Richard Fish wrote:
> > On 11/18/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> I assume gnome-libs-1.4.2 is going to be removed in one month,
> >> but lots of packages directly depend on gnome-libs:
> >> app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6
> > Just recompile this without the gnome USE flag.
>
> That didn't work for me: it still demands the '1' versions of Glib & Gtk+ ,
Try sync'ing again, because the current package.mask [1] isn't masking
gtk+ or glib.
-Richard
[1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?view=markup
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-19 18:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-19 5:28 [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 5:41 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 7:36 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.2 masked? Richard Fish
2006-11-19 7:38 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 9:28 ` Philip Webb
2006-11-19 18:27 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-19 17:47 ` [gentoo-user] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked? Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-11-19 18:20 ` Richard Fish
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox