From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-54647-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GjYeZ-00025X-B9
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:59 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kADA0VpA012732;
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:00:31 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAD9wBcn020540
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:58:12 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so1041722nfb
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:58:11 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=HR/rtnOYTuhoiT3J1OJDKFqYxc4IzWBfxHyYmyE4WeSq64W2DMY6z9ExOpBbASPrSU+3CbV1BoLQKJvUgHhlKx4vSG1fD8IpAtgAd0gpdOHZhw1yJgyiQTN+iucEf+Zb0dUPLzYhozaHJXNHYm9cwwRaoHwDnx+8dXQHeIxXL2c=
Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr593250buc.1163411891193;
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.106.3 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7573e9640611130158n5fee1262mcdc27a36f9961073@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:58:11 -0700
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
Sender: richard.j.fish@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?
In-Reply-To: <25324243.0Ku8CNY5ju@work.message-center.info>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1605421.DR8e0rDRcS@m-id.message-center.info>
<7573e9640611121134q74409038n8a637e1911f53258@mail.gmail.com>
<25324243.0Ku8CNY5ju@work.message-center.info>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: b182b5d546a1cb6c
X-Archives-Salt: 1610697f-ec67-42c5-817b-a5443eb20910
X-Archives-Hash: 7d7e214628028e86d38c6eaf55313571
On 11/13/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
> BTW: That won't work. Suppose a user knows, that mozilla-launcher
> does a openURL remote command and because of that knowledge, he
> makes use of it.
>
> Ie. he calls "firefox http://site/,new-tab" to have http://site/
> opened in a new tab. With your patch, this will no longer work.
True, but you can't have it both ways. Either ',' characters are a
part of the URL, or they are not. And your idea of dumping
mozilla-launcher altogether will also break this case as well.
Besides which, I would say that any user doing that is relying on both
undefined and unexpected behavior. The defined way of doing this
would be "MOZILLA_NEWTYPE=new-tab firefox http://site/".
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list