From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-50439-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GLsV2-0001bW-C3
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:23:16 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k892MQjm001742;
	Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:22:26 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k892HLXx010471
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:17:22 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so977166wxc
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Xw9/QigsoO53SWYfJxkp4kJfyRP4PSGmIu3Aq6Za9C4/9cMMS6TAxZDZPGbxSJ4zMhDRP7/yQNvPTaVh1cKjs3PgfshUjVtI6qjP6MInLMAGDueXVonsjIvuwvuAu+YAgX5AI17zbYbQyiSXj5GT/amoaMFpwT5QzccuLZEOiHo=
Received: by 10.70.83.4 with SMTP id g4mr1031086wxb;
        Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.110.1 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7573e9640609081917x16b7bc05p9449b61b3cf868c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:17:21 -0700
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
Sender: richard.j.fish@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade from 3.x to 4.x, when should I run revdep-rebuild?
In-Reply-To: <450221F1.9070806@vista-express.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609071428540.6851@mail.magrittesystems.com>
	 <45011B5C.10401@arcor.de> <4501696D.6060806@vista-express.com>
	 <200609082138.47990.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
	 <4501DD4D.3010406@vista-express.com>
	 <7573e9640609081427w5b87dda5rbf0370f993bab565@mail.gmail.com>
	 <450221F1.9070806@vista-express.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5fd7cca202a71b94
X-Archives-Salt: fad2a7b8-dbae-41cb-a4a9-f20df48e897d
X-Archives-Hash: f90253036d968e06c96c3c880cde9958

On 9/8/06, Dale <teendale@vista-express.com> wrote:
> So basically if these files don't belong to anything, I can safely
> delete them?

Yep.

> On the roach report, me sort of chicken to edit those files.  Will it be
> OK to let it stay like this and let the bug get fixed?  It's been doing
> this a while and I don't !see! any problems.

Yes, as long as you don't mind the revdep-rebuild borkage.

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list