From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GLadL-0001Fx-L5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:18:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k887Ftsb005673; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:15:56 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8878Emh001500 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:08:14 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so619446wxc for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:08:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=jTK3hq+arB3ER2Idymb6irKGCAg0dCRCIA3rOSpXz5n2s65paw7SnHb5IECZc9QMUM0ImznEhFD1WYjNQEDUitb8aSPKkGanTlfLHq8Z5FrAv/7/cOohfrtMN/1zXVAPVzFvcQndUschraEaFj5uRjAKoQuvggErdb8MwgBWKmo= Received: by 10.70.21.4 with SMTP id 4mr2193913wxu; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.110.1 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7573e9640609080008x3e1d16bai4e4f8c1f40807eb3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:08:13 -0700 From: "Richard Fish" Sender: richard.j.fish@gmail.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: More ebuild failing (install step) In-Reply-To: <87hczj5vd0.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <87d5a9uo0p.fsf@newsguy.com> <7573e9640609061324s5b9ad987p25784844059a66db@mail.gmail.com> <87pse8jv4v.fsf@newsguy.com> <7573e9640609062234o4094da1ex74d4a3c4d90f4d6e@mail.gmail.com> <87r6yn8y6w.fsf@newsguy.com> <7573e9640609071203n7f5e225axb3c4910695aaa7ef@mail.gmail.com> <87hczj5vd0.fsf@newsguy.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 52da0e202d65d514 X-Archives-Salt: 06c18ce0-ee38-4e1a-8a62-7e25091f43ef X-Archives-Hash: 96eb7878173371bdfc7f225d0ecb27f0 On 9/7/06, reader@newsguy.com wrote: > "Richard Fish" writes: > > > This would be a real problem for install, as it would result in the > > source tree being removed and recreated...obviuosly in an unconfigured > > and uncompiled state. > > > > This is odd, and I'm still looking for the solution... > > > > And may be why there is no recent ebuild of samba. Nope. I get the same effect with samba-3.0.23a and samba-3.0.23, both in the portage tree. Looks like the problem comes from the samba-3-gentoo-0.3.14.tar.bz2 archive, which contains an entry for "./" dated from 2005-10-06. This causes the work directory to have that date when the archive is extracted, and confuses ebuild a bit because the distfile now has a more recent date than workdir, so it thinks it needs to recreate workdir. You can work around this problem by running "ebuild ... merge", "ebuild ... package", or just "emerge =net-fs/samba-3.0.23c". http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146801 -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list