public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Decoding / encoding mp3 files
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:40:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7573e9640609011140g5a52e7bfs97bb6be5206937ae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609011812.45823.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

On 9/1/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:
> And recoding: mp3 is a lossy format. If you turn them into wavs you have not
> only wavs based on reduced information, you remove the stuff that makes mp3
> sound 'better' than they are. If you encode them again, you are removing more
> information.

Minor technical correction: wav formats are not even compressed, much
less lossy.  So converting from an mp3 to a wav (which is really just
PCM audio with a header attached) is very much like playing the mp3
through your speakers.  There should be no difference between playing
a wav generated from the mp3 and playing the mp3 itself.

But the point of what you said is correct...the wav file will not have
the same quality as the original recording that the mp3 was generated
from, and an mp3 generated from it will have even lower quality.
Although I suspect that most people couldn't tell the difference
between a 1st gen and 3rd gen mp3 if the bitrate is high enough.  When
I download stuff from iTunes, record it to CD, and then rip to ogg, I
certainly can't tell any difference between the 3 versions.

To answer the OP, I've used sox in the past to convert between
formats.  It can also apply lots of other transformations (noise
filters, volume normalization, tempo adjustments, etc) to the files.

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-01 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-01 15:47 [gentoo-user] [OT] Decoding / encoding mp3 files sdoma
2006-09-01 16:08 ` Uwe Thiem
2006-09-01 16:12 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-09-01 16:21   ` sdoma
2006-09-01 16:58     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-09-01 18:02       ` sdoma
2006-09-01 18:05       ` Martins Steinbergs
2006-09-01 18:40   ` Richard Fish [this message]
2006-09-01 19:23   ` darren kirby
2006-09-01 21:29     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-09-01 23:14       ` Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
2006-09-02  0:46         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-09-02  3:54           ` kashani
2006-09-02  8:40             ` Mick
2006-09-02  1:53       ` darren kirby
2006-09-02 14:37         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-09-02  7:18 ` sdoma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7573e9640609011140g5a52e7bfs97bb6be5206937ae@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bigfish@asmallpond.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox