public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] emege -e system; emerge -e world  and GCC4
@ 2006-08-23 17:56 michael higgins
  2006-08-23 18:25 ` Richard Fish
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: michael higgins @ 2006-08-23 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hello, list.

I have a silly (I expect) question about the topic in the subject line. After (if and when?) this completes -- as I've had to "emerge --resume --skip-first" a bunch of times -- how will I be able to determine which packages failed so I may then attempt to emerge them individually (or remove them from world)?

. . .

Also:
# gcc-config -c
i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.0.3

# gcc-config -l
 [1] i386-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.3
 [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
 [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
 [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
 [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
 [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp
 [7] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.0.3 *
 [8] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1

...I didn't expect to compile [8]. I must have set my portage/package.* files up incorrectly[?] 

Any suggestions? Should I choose [8] now? If so, will I then have to re-emerge world and system?

Any suggestions appreciated.

TIA

-- 
 |\  /|        |   |          ~ ~  
 | \/ |        |---|          `|` ?
 |    |ichael  |   |iggins    \^ /
 michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] emege -e system; emerge -e world and GCC4
  2006-08-23 17:56 [gentoo-user] emege -e system; emerge -e world and GCC4 michael higgins
@ 2006-08-23 18:25 ` Richard Fish
  2006-08-29  1:13   ` michael higgins
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-08-23 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On 8/23/06, michael higgins <linux@evolone.com> wrote:
> I have a silly (I expect) question about the topic in the subject line. After (if and when?) this completes -- as I've had to "emerge --resume --skip-first" a bunch of times -- how will I be able to determine which packages failed so I may then attempt to emerge them individually (or remove them from world)?

Search the package database for packages installed more than X days
ago.  To find everything that was last installed more than 3 days ago,
you can use:

cd /var/db/pkg
find ./ -name "*.ebuild" -mtime +3

> # gcc-config -l
>  [1] i386-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.3
>  [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
>  [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
>  [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
>  [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
>  [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp
>  [7] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.0.3 *
>  [8] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
>
> ...I didn't expect to compile [8]. I must have set my portage/package.* files up incorrectly[?]

Um, oops.  4.0.3 is masked  by "missing keyword" for every arch except
~ia64.  Unless you have "-*" in  ACCEPT_KEYWORDS  or
/e/p/package.keywords, you should not have been able to install this.
FYI 4.1.1 is the current ~x86 version.

You should take a look at "emerge --info | grep KEYWORDS" and "grep
gcc /etc/portage/*".

> Any suggestions? Should I choose [8] now? If so, will I then have to re-emerge world and system?

Considering that you just recompiled your system with a gcc version
that the gentoo devs consider to be broken for your arch....yes, yes,
and yes. :-(

Now that sounds rather doomsday-ish, it probably really just means
there are a lot of things in the tree that will not build with it, and
not that it produces broken binaries.  But it is better to be safe on
this one.

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] emege -e system; emerge -e world and GCC4
  2006-08-23 18:25 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-08-29  1:13   ` michael higgins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: michael higgins @ 2006-08-29  1:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:25:03 -0700
"Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org> wrote:

> On 8/23/06, michael higgins <linux@evolone.com> wrote:

[ 8< ]

> Considering that you just recompiled your system with a gcc version
> that the gentoo devs consider to be broken for your arch....yes, yes,
> and yes. :-(
> 
> Now that sounds rather doomsday-ish, it probably really just means
> there are a lot of things in the tree that will not build with it, and
> not that it produces broken binaries.  But it is better to be safe on
> this one.
> 

Thanks, Richard. It seems that some packages (mostly sound synths and the like) aren't yet ready to compile under 4.1.1, but it was a bit better than my first attempt with keyword ~*.

Thanks again.

-- 
 |\  /|        |   |          ~ ~  
 | \/ |        |---|          `|` ?
 |    |ichael  |   |iggins    \^ /
 michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-29  1:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-23 17:56 [gentoo-user] emege -e system; emerge -e world and GCC4 michael higgins
2006-08-23 18:25 ` Richard Fish
2006-08-29  1:13   ` michael higgins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox