From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GFbGO-0007v3-6x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:46:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7MIi0Ha003445; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:00 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7MIe39q003076 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:40:04 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so2066547wxc for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:40:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RNi7kLJ8OdeSwVotzKoqRyGCmelZSrilCR3CF2xcBbOEgexTrYRQm7puHTK9MWb1woErF+EmxchY3aT5/qj6Dwoa2RoPeVYHABxn7iqcrfcside9PkTQepOpuroTbiWtyCifo1E2TVwod52WuxAUqZhXyODWX1bbDkBpbQ1AxfM= Received: by 10.70.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr12166920wxb; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.110.1 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7573e9640608221140o1fa1d552yd56aa152e00d21db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:40:03 -0700 From: "Richard Fish" Sender: richard.j.fish@gmail.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How to properly change CFLAGS ? In-Reply-To: <1156255958.20980.24.camel@gentoo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EA1CDF.1000304@xunil.at> <1156255958.20980.24.camel@gentoo> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5be127a04119c9c9 X-Archives-Salt: d2595b8c-7672-494c-822a-bb816ea5da79 X-Archives-Hash: 17730ff88011a9cadef904d1765de4f0 On 8/22/06, Alan Mckinnon wrote: > Your current compiler was built with -O3, and you want to rebuild the > system using a compiler compiled as -O2, hence the 2 step process. *Sigh*. I am so tired of this completely wrong information showing up here. 1. It does not matter what -OX flag gcc is compiled with. It has absolutely *zero* effect on the code that gcc *generates*. 2. There is also absolutely no reason to build gcc twice. There is no such thing as a gcc that was built with the "system compiler", because gcc uses itself to build itself. It is called a 3-stage bootstrap, and I suggest you read the gcc documentation first if you want to debate this point. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list