From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-47331-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1G5mVT-0003Ki-Hd
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:45:11 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6QGgvOx001163;
	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:42:57 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6QGeNO8028477
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:40:24 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so744633nfc
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=mtaplxRty4IV/d5BqDH794qXX4Hn8qDyp4gBVH9y9Eb6O4I1KPXisSx9gKvOugpyIR9DvMej5JkfGXB1ii2kcAKSXg/LkisuiBPNR45NzvJUpbTmDwsOdxEfldnasJPre9rOHKkYwHboV6cc1GkqiwoLQQkIxpYC3uqOQmPPrBw=
Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr3254181huf;
        Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.16.7 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7573e9640607260940l65902e20oc2e1b88f694cffd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
Sender: richard.j.fish@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [gentoo-user] How packages becomes stable?
In-Reply-To: <Mahogany-0.66.0-12603-20060726-180423.00@kihnet.sk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Mahogany-0.66.0-12221-20060725-212215.00@kihnet.sk>
	 <7573e9640607251348w6ccfd9eu4729e48bcffe413a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Mahogany-0.66.0-12525-20060726-065920.00@kihnet.sk>
	 <7573e9640607252358j202ab3d3k4c00749bf429a5e9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Mahogany-0.66.0-12603-20060726-180423.00@kihnet.sk>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4795b3bcafdd0ca6
X-Archives-Salt: c273fbc3-d8b5-485a-9556-b379ffa067aa
X-Archives-Hash: 3469f7b4a2ac6331d2d6084fd7d53156

On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky <hslists2@zoznam.sk> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@asmallpond.org> wrote:
>
> RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <hslists2@zoznam.sk> wrote:
> RF> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@asmallpond.org> wrote:
> RF>
> RF> > RF> Regardless, if there are packages you feel are ready to go
> RF> > RF> to stable, you can file bugs on bugs.gentoo.org to
> RF> > RF> request stabilization.
> RF> >
> RF> > Of course I can but I want to point out that this should happen
> RF> > occasionally. I reported several packages to be keyworded for amd64
> RF> > year ago and none of them is stable yet. So it seems to me that
> RF> > this is not "bug", this is a "rule".
> RF>
> RF> Are these packages stable for x86?
>
> Yes, they are stable for x86.

Can you give an example or two?

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list