public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAID 1+0 question
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:57:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7573e9640603020857j5b882231w6d588b6ac6e05881@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44071B0A.7000609@vehok.vein.hu>

On 3/2/06, Marton Gabor <gabor.marton@vehok.vein.hu> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you all for the fast replies, you helped me a lot. Unfortunately
> we cannot afford a HW RAID card, so I have to make it with software RAID.
> Now I have the idea to use RAID5 and if I get the picure rigth I need
> let's say a ~100MB /boot in RAID1, 512MB swap not in RAID on every disk,
> and I can build a RAID5 from the rest of the storage space, and will be
> able to use 750GB-(/boot*4)-(swap*4) and the 4th HD will store the
> so-called parity information.

FYI, RAID5 will spread the parity information across all disks.

You should also consider what kind of IO throughput you require from
this system.  RAID5 will require an IO to every drive for each write
operation.  Additionally, reads can only be satisfied by a single
drive.  This means your write performance will max out at around
33MB/s, and reads will max out at the speed of the disks (70MB/s
typical today)

However writes to a RAID 0+1 array will only require writing to 2
disks, so your maximum bandwidth should be around 66MB/s when writing.
 Reads really benefit here however, since they can be satisfied by
either RAID1 set, so you should easily be able to saturate the bus
bandwidth at 132MB/s.

Of course, if you really need IO bandwidth, hardware RAID is best...

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-02 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ac6df3680601312047g2141312bnccdc3284defb247@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <43E03ED1.8050700@drelmo.net>
2006-03-01 12:54   ` [gentoo-user] RAID 1+0 question Marton Gabor
2006-03-01 14:12     ` jarry
2006-03-01 21:04       ` Matt Randolph
     [not found]   ` <44059634.5050904@vehok.vein.hu>
     [not found]     ` <1141218922.7376.49.camel@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <4406402A.9090509@adaptr.nl>
     [not found]         ` <1141290041.6036.28.camel@localhost>
2006-03-02 16:19           ` Marton Gabor
2006-03-02 16:57             ` Richard Fish [this message]
2006-03-02 17:58               ` Jarry
2006-03-02 20:06                 ` Richard Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7573e9640603020857j5b882231w6d588b6ac6e05881@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bigfish@asmallpond.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox