public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Fish <bigfish@asmallpond.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:22:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7573e9640511161422g122aebb0gf74c2dd5ff9500c3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy <tracyde@gmail.com> wrote:
> When a branch is marked stable all of the packages in that branch should
> work,

I'm not sure this is always possible.  Much of your complaint comes
from the ipw2200 driver, which is new in 2.6.14.  But the in-kernel
version is several versions older than the external driver.  So should
2.6.14 remain marked as unstable because of this one driver that works
for some people, but not for others?  Or because a specific externally
maintained driver or package doesn't build against it?

On my system, either the in-kernel or external drivers work fine.  The
only caveat is that I need firmware version 2.2 with the in-kernel
drivers, and a different version for the external.  If I am using the
external version, the portage dependancy tree makes sure I have the
right version of the firmware.  But the kernel sources do not (and
should not) depend upon the ipw2200-firmware package, so this is a
case where I need to know the driver requirements.  (Also, the kernel
help specifies that the driver requires external firmware, although it
doesn't specify what version.)

Regarding the X.org issue, without an Xorg.0.log file, it is really
impossible to say what the problem there is.  It could be something as
simple as your kernel configuration; for example leaving out I2C or
AGP support could cause this.

But in my view, you cannot take an existing xorg.conf file and expect
it to work without any issues _without_ duplicating the same system
configuration (kernel version, kernel config, and nvidia driver
version).  The fastest method of configuring X on a new system is to
run "X -configure", test the resulting configuration, and use that
xorg.conf file.  Yes, this would use the opensource x.org Nv driver,
but it should definitely work for getting X up and running.  If this
doesn't work, then you have reason to complain.

If the proprietary nvidia driver doesn't work with a particular kernel
version, you can only complain to nvidia.

I'm quite sure a binary-based distribution would have worked better
for you in this case, only because nothing would have been upgraded or
changed.  Everything that worked before would have continued to work,
just like everything that was broken before would have continued to be
broken.  It is the price of progress, IMO.

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-16 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07   ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50   ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50     ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32       ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17  0:26         ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24       ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59         ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17  7:44   ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17  3:03       ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17  9:23         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52           ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44               ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21           ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17  0:17     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17  0:34       ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30   ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04     ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30   ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47     ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55       ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59         ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10         ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20           ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31             ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24             ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33           ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53         ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54   ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish [this message]
2005-11-16 22:37   ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17  0:21     ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7573e9640511161422g122aebb0gf74c2dd5ff9500c3@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bigfish@asmallpond.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox