Re: [gentoo-user] NTFS vs ext3

["Shawn Singh" <callmeshawn@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1422 bytes --]

It's been a couple years since I was in such a scenario, but I'd say that r
w speed was adequate for what I was trying to do ( access documents, music,
etc that resided on my Windows partition ).  In looking at the NTFS-3G
driver, it seems like it might be cool to try out, though I can't comment on
how "safe" or "fast" it is being that I've not used it. It's been about 2
years since I've cut completely away from Windows ( at home ), and since
that time I've gradually begun to use ReiserFS, and for stuff that I want to
share to Windows computers ( ex. my wife's computer ( running Windows ) ), I
share that content via Samba.

Shawn

On 11/18/06, Daniel Vrcic <daniel.vrcic@si.htnet.hr> wrote:
>
> * Shawn Singh <callmeshawn@gmail.com> [06-11-17 09:10]:
> > In ( what seems like ) similar situatoins, I've just let the partition
> > that I want to "share" b/w OSes just be a NTFS partition if say, I
> > were dual-booting my machine ( Linux & Windows ). IMHO, Linux support
> > for NTFS is fine, meaning that I've not experienced any trouble
> > related to doing that.
>
> You have also experienced satisfactory writing speed? You're using
> ntfs-3g?
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vrcic
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


-- 
"...the return which is executed immediately after the call to aretu
actually returns from the last routine which did the savu.
You are not expected to understand this."
Unix Sixth Edition

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1912 bytes --]