From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-54888-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GkpxL-0006Ly-Dt
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:43:39 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAGMfR1R001235;
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:41:27 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAGMdN1n028610
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:39:23 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so554691ugc
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:39:23 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=lj00JcACrBXqkqTUhsQhascC+oLipsTFdQhrxd08YcAM2m1BGSyY2NqhUxz8wR3gyVgcHVsq38pieZxMuKHgM8OBOP6i1+/YmanZ+Nigj/ArjThzdQKNBVX4OSuCqFoh0JkRY0lbw500SmUNH13G77284GEALF+xVB9MvDi6Sss=
Received: by 10.78.204.1 with SMTP id b1mr1162400hug.1163716763281;
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.179.19 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7225537e0611161439q16de6904p7d0845c7711d0db6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:39:23 -0500
From: "Shawn Singh" <callmeshawn@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NTFS vs ext3
In-Reply-To: <4bf052bf0611161418k715cb891t76b41fbdf7dd750c@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_77869_22889658.1163716763250"
References: <4bf052bf0611161418k715cb891t76b41fbdf7dd750c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 390dd98f-0299-46ab-9775-589180f52857
X-Archives-Hash: e7631a1c9ead5965873be555577fa337
------=_Part_77869_22889658.1163716763250
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
In ( what seems like ) similar situatoins, I've just let the partition that
I want to "share" b/w OSes just be a NTFS partition if say, I were
dual-booting my machine ( Linux & Windows ). IMHO, Linux support for NTFS is
fine, meaning that I've not experienced any trouble related to doing that.
Shawn
On 11/16/06, Ghaith Hachem <blacksadness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hey,
> i was wondering what would be the best solution for a shared data
> partition, it's a 100GB partition, and FAT is not an option, so should i use
> ext2 (or ext3) with one of the tools on windows? and which tool would you
> recommend I'm currently using ext2fsd to read my ext2 backup harddrive i
> think it has ext3 write support..
> Or should i go the other way around and put my data on an NTFS partition,
> and if i do that is the NTFS write support stable by now.. it's been a long
> time since i dual booted so back then NTFS support was not really a good
> idea..
>
> thank you in advance
>
> --
> Ghaith Hachem
> TristMoon Staff
> TristMoon.com
--
"...the return which is executed immediately after the call to aretu
actually returns from the last routine which did the savu.
You are not expected to understand this."
Unix Sixth Edition
------=_Part_77869_22889658.1163716763250
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
In ( what seems like ) similar situatoins, I've just let the partition that I want to "share" b/w OSes just be a NTFS partition if say, I were dual-booting my machine ( Linux & Windows ). IMHO, Linux support for NTFS is fine, meaning that I've not experienced any trouble related to doing that.
<br><br>Shawn<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/16/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ghaith Hachem</b> <<a href="mailto:blacksadness@gmail.com">blacksadness@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
hey, <br>i was wondering what would be the best solution for a shared data partition, it's a 100GB partition, and FAT is not an option, so should i use ext2 (or ext3) with one of the tools on windows? and which tool would you recommend I'm currently using ext2fsd to read my ext2 backup harddrive i think it has ext3 write support..
<br>Or should i go the other way around and put my data on an NTFS partition, and if i do that is the NTFS write support stable by now.. it's been a long time since i dual booted so back then NTFS support was not really a good idea..
<br><br>thank you in advance<br clear="all"><span class="sg"><br>-- <br>Ghaith Hachem<br>TristMoon Staff<br>TristMoon.com
</span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"...the return which is executed immediately after the call to aretu actually returns from the last routine which did the savu.<br>You are not expected to understand this."
<br>Unix Sixth Edition
------=_Part_77869_22889658.1163716763250--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list