From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F74138CA4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AE52E085C; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0131.smtp25.com (mail0131.smtp25.com [75.126.84.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83555E0848 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t3OM91l3007153 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:09:01 -0400 From: covici@ccs.covici.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] serious problems trying to go to new abi_x86_32 support In-reply-to: References: <12441.1429904241@ccs.covici.com> <10896.1429908712@ccs.covici.com> Comments: In-reply-to Mike Gilbert message dated "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:58:03 -0400." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7151.1429913341.1@ccs.covici.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: <7152.1429913341@ccs.covici.com> X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-t3OM92d4014837 X-Archives-Salt: 16c1322a-5aec-439c-8246-686a2f3aa7a5 X-Archives-Hash: d7f5c6bb15e941e252d4e393614319f3 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote: > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote: > >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I > >> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them, > >> > because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should r= un > >> > emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did and every time I run that, it > >> > gives me another package to change its use flag to add abi_x86_32. > >> > After doing some 70 of those (a pain), I get to something which I c= annot > >> > solve. At some early point portage suggested that I run --newuse > >> > --update when doing this, but now I am down to the following: > >> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy > >> > ">=3Dsys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_= x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(= -)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]" > >> > have been masked. > >> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete yo= ur > >> > request: > >> > - sys-apps/systemd-9999::gentoo (masked by: package.mask, missing > >> > keyword) > >> > /etc/portage/package.mask: > >> > #need that system because of older kernel > >> > >> I'm confused. Are you saying that you have sys-apps/systemd in > >> /etc/portage/package.mask? > > ] > > I had to mask off later versions of systemd because I cannot use a > > kernel which is required by later versions of systemd. > = > Later than what? What version of systemd do you have installed? > = > There is probably no way to resolve the situation you are in if you > cannot rebuild systemd with the appropriate use flags. I am using 2.12-r5. I guess I need to restore the system to before I started fooling with things. I tried to pub abi_x86_32 in the make.conf, but no joy. -- = Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com