From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 18:34:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dd775d2-3979-eeef-6d9a-489b5de31a3e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3d3c9c0-1d83-1854-edc7-4893b7d0da67@gmail.com>
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 12/8/22 05:58, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>> I was thinking DAS was not a good option. It seems like a feature
>> removed and cheaper version of NAS.
>>
>> I think I've seen a couple Synology NAS boxes but I think even used
>> they were a bit pricey. Still, used could make that a option.
>> Maybe. It could fall into the category of pay a little more for a
>> much better option, even if it is used.
>>
>> I've considered using older systems I have for NAS but they are
>> large. Way to large. It would require a lot of effort to shrink
>> them down if it is even possible. A NAS is smaller and designed for
>> what I need as well. This is what I found that goes with the
>> Raspberry Pi.
>>
>> https://shop.allnetchina.cn/collections/sata-hat/products/dual-sata-hat-open-frame-for-raspberry-pi-4
>>
>>
>> There is a two bay and a four bay version. I think the case is the
>> same for both so I may go with four for future expansion. Price
>> isn't bad for that part but as you say, Raspberry Pi board is a bit
>> pricey. Thing is, given the amount of control I'd have over it, it
>> could be a better option long term. I might add, I think this board
>> is somewhat new. I meant to include a link to it but forget. It
>> could be that you are not aware of that, or many other people
>> either. Also, I'd like to buy it from a more local vendor. I've
>> bought things from China through Ebay but it has a guarantee and
>> refund option that is fairly good. It's a option I've had to
>> exercise a time or two.
>>
>> Part of me wants to buy a used but well featured NAS box. Part of me
>> thinks a Raspberry would be better and have upgrade options in the
>> future as well. I'm pretty sure I could have encryption on a
>> Raspberry NAS as well. I'm not sure if a prebuilt NAS box has
>> encryption or not.
>>
>> Hope for some good ideas tho. I'd like to avoid buying something
>> that won't come close to serving even current needs or just plain
>> doesn't work.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> Dale,
>
> DAS is direct attached storage. If your intention is to share the data
> with multiple devices for backup you will need to keep in mind that
> you will need a PC to share the data the DAS device is storing. In
> general, most DAS require some sort of HBA (some of these HBAs can be
> hundreds to thousands of dollars.) I've seen some eSata ones but they
> usually don't have stellar reviews. It's also getting harder to find
> eSata devices.
>
> In contrast NAS devices are designed to plug in to the network and be
> shared with multiple devices on the LAN right from the get-go.
>
> You are probably interested in a NAS, not a DAS.
>
> I have an aging ix4-300d NAS. The display has started crashing now but
> the device is still rock solid. However I'm in the same boat and have
> been researching options - I think for my case I will get a small cube
> case and mini-ITX board and roll my own Gentoo install. The cost may
> even be slightly cheaper as 4 bay NAS here are quite expensive where I
> am (with no drives installed) and building my own will be a bit
> cheaper and I can choose what drives to run in it. Vulnerabilities on
> devices like QNAP and Synology are very real and at least if you can
> roll your own you can keep that to a minimum (like an example not
> running a web browser to configure things.)
>
> Dan
>
>
I was thinking DAS wouldn't fit my needs. Just wasn't real sure what
the difference was. Someone always coming up with something that only
half works. :/
Right now, I have a modem/router in one that the ISP provided. I have a
separate router that I use since I can control access with it. The ISP
modem/router can not be accessed by me. Supposedly, it has some
protection but without access, who knows. Either way, I'd connect a NAS
to my router that I control and if possible, forbid internet access. If
possible, I may restrict it to ethernet access only, no wifi connection
either. That should lock it down. Also, I only update backups once a
week for maybe a hour or less. The window for a hacker would be small
anyway.
I looked into buying/building a really small puter but with a lot of
drive bays. Thing is, they have few SATA ports and not many ways to add
any plus they end up being to large. I really don't like USB for my
data much. I've had a lot of bad experiences with USB and hard drives.
Still, if this Raspberry thing uses it and others make it work fine, I'd
give it a shot.
Still reading posts and trying to sort things out. Also, searching
around for NAS boxes just in case I run up on a steal of a deal. :-D
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 12:37 [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives Dale
2022-12-08 13:31 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-08 13:58 ` Dale
2022-12-08 17:16 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-08 23:35 ` Daniel Frey
2022-12-09 0:34 ` Dale [this message]
2022-12-10 0:10 ` Paul Colquhoun
2022-12-08 18:36 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-08 20:05 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-08 20:44 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-09 13:13 ` Michael
2022-12-09 13:38 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-09 14:27 ` [OT] " Peter Humphrey
2022-12-09 14:38 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-10 0:41 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-12-09 15:28 ` Dale
2022-12-10 9:20 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-10 16:19 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-10 16:30 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-10 17:27 ` Michael
2022-12-10 18:17 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-11 4:45 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-09 14:15 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-08 23:09 ` Dale
2022-12-08 13:52 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-08 23:30 ` Dale
2022-12-08 23:38 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-09 0:03 ` Dale
2022-12-09 0:17 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-12-09 0:45 ` Dale
2022-12-09 8:27 ` Wol
2022-12-09 10:34 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-12-11 11:34 ` [OT] " Peter Humphrey
2022-12-13 17:36 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-12-09 8:24 ` Wol
2022-12-09 0:06 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-09 1:15 ` Dale
2022-12-09 7:56 ` Wol
2022-12-09 9:15 ` Dale
2022-12-09 6:22 ` William Kenworthy
2022-12-08 13:59 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-08 14:11 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-08 16:56 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-12-08 23:26 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-09 14:11 ` Dale
2022-12-10 20:41 ` Dale
2022-12-10 21:28 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-10 23:54 ` Dale
2022-12-11 3:31 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-11 4:35 ` Dale
2022-12-11 14:07 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-11 15:01 ` Dale
2022-12-11 15:44 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-11 23:43 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-12 0:32 ` Dale
2022-12-12 1:55 ` Dale
2022-12-12 23:29 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-13 0:43 ` Dale
2022-12-11 2:46 ` David Rosenbaum
[not found] ` <CAL+8heNN7CCQcTrhjuJboAnxvi7ACWVAgPuXqj3bwTPNaNQ94A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-12-11 2:49 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-11 4:38 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-16 4:08 ` Dale
2022-12-16 12:56 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-16 22:35 ` Dale
2022-12-16 19:12 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-16 22:43 ` Dale
2022-12-16 23:49 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-17 3:50 ` Dale
2022-12-17 4:47 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-17 6:49 ` Dale
2022-12-17 13:54 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-17 15:15 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-17 15:51 ` Dale
2022-12-17 16:09 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-17 16:42 ` Dale
2022-12-17 17:18 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-17 22:56 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-17 19:10 ` Wol
2022-12-17 20:03 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-17 23:41 ` Dale
2022-12-18 14:04 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 15:12 ` Dale
2022-12-18 15:27 ` Michael
2022-12-18 18:38 ` Dale
2022-12-18 18:55 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 19:20 ` Dale
2022-12-18 19:25 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 22:08 ` Dale
2022-12-19 21:13 ` ralfconn
2022-12-18 18:56 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-18 15:29 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-18 18:59 ` Dale
2022-12-18 19:53 ` Wol
2022-12-18 22:11 ` Dale
2022-12-19 11:08 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-20 6:52 ` Dale
2022-12-26 8:01 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-26 8:00 ` David Rosenbaum
2022-12-18 15:29 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 15:38 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 15:48 ` Living in NGL: was: " Jack
2022-12-18 16:17 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 19:00 ` Jack
2022-12-18 19:07 ` Dale
2022-12-18 19:22 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 19:30 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-18 20:06 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-18 20:30 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 20:34 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 20:53 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-18 21:53 ` Dale
2022-12-18 22:08 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-18 22:18 ` Dale
2022-12-19 1:37 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-19 5:11 ` Dale
2022-12-19 12:00 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-19 12:51 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-19 13:30 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-19 16:43 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-20 0:00 ` Rich Freeman
2022-12-20 1:46 ` William Kenworthy
2022-12-18 17:11 ` Wol
2022-12-18 18:03 ` Mark Knecht
2022-12-18 0:20 ` Wol
2022-12-17 20:47 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-21 0:14 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-21 2:47 ` Dale
2022-12-21 5:53 ` Wols Lists
2022-12-21 6:19 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-21 7:01 ` William Kenworthy
2022-12-21 20:03 ` Wol
2022-12-21 20:40 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2022-12-21 21:33 ` Wol
2022-12-21 6:52 ` Dale
2022-12-21 13:50 ` Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6dd775d2-3979-eeef-6d9a-489b5de31a3e@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox