From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITAE7-0004wn-30 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:48:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l865eNFK029087; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:40:23 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l865a24c024114 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:36:02 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so97915wxd for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=frpAkBkbUq7iXDFSnFyaWicpGwrakFC/OdZzsrlwxrE=; b=BIrKlgIMpiHGDy5mh3mE1fQRR4Kjte8NK4ewxKKS8rnO5w2fNLiO/FXNurS5B9TxZFUgysTMz3fUWHoZpidwYfiaIq7YFd2r5vVYKqGMwJoCfj+1PVCTNC2o9yHeGwOcoROKk95r9zv2jVn63l2f2wR5pW1H9gnP4kHL7vw9dIk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jtyOfRNFP1uqfUi7FewPgWZa5Kr9Ime9c5VKvgo1cwJAMlXL+zWmQuLyyOT2K1XI8TQZWO8Nlk/SogdcRGS+gjoD1jseNae2n65w8zoH2V9qo1n1q3trQZVYAEpg2bnXR6VCds+FxVz8UNcP35ghhL1A/8J3NPcNz+yrDbwP6l4= Received: by 10.90.92.10 with SMTP id p10mr378513agb.1189056961927; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.95.16 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6ae156900709052236g6d096ff5v6c186d6efa83615d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:36:01 +0200 From: "emerge.gentoo" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error In-Reply-To: <200709051456.34577.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_44001_26288533.1189056961900" References: <6ae156900709050453n63acbea2me5ef0d33b14812b9@mail.gmail.com> <200709051356.11135.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <6ae156900709050525x16ee547ga23363d3222affd1@mail.gmail.com> <200709051456.34577.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> X-Archives-Salt: 13d09528-fe14-476a-9686-65ed9c985744 X-Archives-Hash: be65e610c18fb576d6a368b2c8067b5b ------=_Part_44001_26288533.1189056961900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. On 05/09/07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: > > Your problems start here (line 10 of the output you posted), and just > gets worse from there: > > > rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in > > this function) > > This package is package.masked since 16 Jan 2007 (!) for testing by the > developer, so you should submit the bug report to him/her to fix these > compile errors. > > It doesn't surprise me that it has been masked for so long, it must be a > rare system indeed that has rpm installed on a portage box :-) > > Why don't you emerge 4.4.6-r4 instead, which is keyworded ~ on all > arches? > or 4.4.6-r3 which is stable on all arches > > alan > > > > -- > Optimists say the glass is half full, > Pessimists say the glass is half empty, > Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? > > Alan McKinnon > alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za > +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------=_Part_44001_26288533.1189056961900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before.

On 05/09/07, Alan McKinnon < alan@linuxholdings.co.za> wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote:

Your problems start here (line 10 of the output you posted), and just
gets worse from there:

> rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in
> this function)

This package is package.masked since 16 Jan 2007 (!) for testing by the
developer, so you should submit the bug report to him/her to fix these
compile errors.

It doesn't surprise me that it has been masked for so long, it must be a
rare system indeed that has rpm installed on a portage box :-)

Why don't you emerge 4.4.6-r4 instead, which is keyworded ~ on all
arches?
or 4.4.6-r3 which is stable on all arches

alan



--
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


------=_Part_44001_26288533.1189056961900-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list