On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V.
<arttuv69@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <
landronimirc@gmail.com> wrote:
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage"
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been
attempted with these two lines. Would it work better without overlays,
i.e., by commenting these two out?
Well, doing so (#PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage") I did get a different error message. Same spot, but now Portage tells me:
################## Build debug ##################
*
* ERROR: app-office/abiword-2.6.4 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 3299: Called gnome2_src_compile
* environment, line 2312: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* emake || die "compile failure"
* The die message:
* compile failure
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/abiword-2.6.4/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/abiword-2.6.4/temp/environment'.
* This ebuild used the following eclasses from overlays:
* /usr/portage/eclass/alternatives.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/eutils.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/multilib.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/portability.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/gnome2.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/fdo-mime.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/libtool.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/gnome.org.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/gnome2-utils.eclass
* /usr/portage/eclass/versionator.eclass
*
################## End of build debug ##################
Ideas, anyone?
Liviu