From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdTPj-00082O-0G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:19:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l94G8XoM018793; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:08:33 GMT Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l94G44MY013885 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:04:06 GMT Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so530180pyb for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=PzLgKwzgjzbZUlrQzERR8JYeckcKxLxcvqGxfSLufDo=; b=PyLol1LSOzFOzO3XluE8CBppV9zZLZHM9TSqfXdd0DSLcAmCMtzToCQfSigUPHebHImDW20ftCtiKtzddVUSblbYRY3qQZzK52Imgkey0vpXTiJbRB7z/3Z9XgSepwRsCIvhYgY3yhZlUFjv9oOdPfY+Xv/F4rK2D+jrscPx3Kc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aPL0LnSNX4m9KChgSGXmnwIuuMQW2Lj4UlXWTMqpnqSsdjFKceSXHlZ0jcbdWGgH/R9GDuR0gLxteSnx36hivLlXTjg70eaGhx++zCHW+VZE8tSACi87UHpIJskBWP6MIPSaR+ELYVt7zFPwQ0aTMNsGVqfLn5q3SiveCEIvgNg= Received: by 10.65.158.9 with SMTP id k9mr14317875qbo.1191513844318; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.215.19 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <68b1e2610710040904j4c8168b4pd5693b0133451e1f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:04:04 +0200 From: "Liviu Andronic" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can RAM render useless the encryption of the / and swap partitions? In-Reply-To: <200710041752.03322.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <68b1e2610710032342j1b47ff5g8f868d8fcc0179ef@mail.gmail.com> <200710041547.53084.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <20071004163457.2bf0ad43.hilse@web.de> <200710041752.03322.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Archives-Salt: 9f49ad13-2021-4270-8390-cc185ae0718c X-Archives-Hash: 9d074e55b07d73296fa5924064542c3f On 10/4/07, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > in practice, the ram has to refreshed every few cycles (on reason why it is > slow) because it is loosing its load so fast. > > In practice, after power is cut, everything in ram is lost. > > But not the stuff in swap.... Considering that swap is encrypted, is it realistic for this "lost" RAM data to be recovered? Again, take the case of a well funded organization. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list