public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:27:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6661527.9k004Oio64@eve> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A158B10.6090007@youngman.org.uk>

On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 3:34:56 PM CET Wols Lists wrote:
> On 22/11/17 14:11, Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor wrote:
> > You won't get build failures or dependency problems, portage is built to
> > handle emerging multiple packages that do not depend on each other
> > simultaneously.
> > it will not ever build a dependency and the main program at the same time.
> 
> Are you sure?
> 
> You *shouldn't* get problems, but I'm sure I have hit that problem, and
> I think it's down to buggy ebuilds.

buggy, as in, at least one dependency missed.

> Starting the emerge again fixes it, because cocked-up dependencies will
> sort themselves out first time round, and the second time the problem
> has gone away.

2nd time the dependency might have been installed already.
Sometime it hasn't.

This can also cause a failure when not using parallel builds for exactly the 
same reason.

--
Joost


  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22  6:52 [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22  7:21 ` R0b0t1
2017-11-22  7:26 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2017-11-22  8:23   ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-22  8:34   ` David Haller
2017-11-22 10:07     ` [gentoo-user] " Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 11:26       ` David Haller
2017-11-23 22:47         ` Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 13:12   ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22 13:23     ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22 14:11     ` Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor
2017-11-22 14:34       ` Wols Lists
2017-11-22 16:27         ` J. Roeleveld [this message]
2017-12-05  4:11           ` Taiidan
2017-12-05  4:17             ` R0b0t1
2017-12-05 10:09             ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 10:46               ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 11:13                 ` Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-05 11:39                   ` Mick
2017-12-05 13:07                 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 13:57                   ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 14:13                     ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 21:56               ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-06 13:29                 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 15:34                   ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-06 16:07                     ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 23:51                       ` [gentoo-user] " Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-06 16:12                     ` [gentoo-user] " Wols Lists
2017-12-06 17:24                     ` Kai Peter
2017-11-22  7:48 ` David Haller
2017-11-22  8:32   ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22  8:57     ` David Haller
2017-11-22 12:16       ` Peter Humphrey
2017-11-22 16:36       ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-28 10:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-01 10:39   ` J. Roeleveld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6661527.9k004Oio64@eve \
    --to=joost@antarean.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox