From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:27:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6661527.9k004Oio64@eve> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A158B10.6090007@youngman.org.uk>
On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 3:34:56 PM CET Wols Lists wrote:
> On 22/11/17 14:11, Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor wrote:
> > You won't get build failures or dependency problems, portage is built to
> > handle emerging multiple packages that do not depend on each other
> > simultaneously.
> > it will not ever build a dependency and the main program at the same time.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> You *shouldn't* get problems, but I'm sure I have hit that problem, and
> I think it's down to buggy ebuilds.
buggy, as in, at least one dependency missed.
> Starting the emerge again fixes it, because cocked-up dependencies will
> sort themselves out first time round, and the second time the problem
> has gone away.
2nd time the dependency might have been installed already.
Sometime it hasn't.
This can also cause a failure when not using parallel builds for exactly the
same reason.
--
Joost
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-22 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 6:52 [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22 7:21 ` R0b0t1
2017-11-22 7:26 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2017-11-22 8:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-22 8:34 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 10:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 11:26 ` David Haller
2017-11-23 22:47 ` Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 13:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22 13:23 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22 14:11 ` Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor
2017-11-22 14:34 ` Wols Lists
2017-11-22 16:27 ` J. Roeleveld [this message]
2017-12-05 4:11 ` Taiidan
2017-12-05 4:17 ` R0b0t1
2017-12-05 10:09 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 10:46 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 11:13 ` Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-05 11:39 ` Mick
2017-12-05 13:07 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 13:57 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 14:13 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 21:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-06 13:29 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 15:34 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-06 16:07 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 23:51 ` [gentoo-user] " Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-06 16:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Wols Lists
2017-12-06 17:24 ` Kai Peter
2017-11-22 7:48 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 8:32 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22 8:57 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 12:16 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-11-22 16:36 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-28 10:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-01 10:39 ` J. Roeleveld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6661527.9k004Oio64@eve \
--to=joost@antarean.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox