From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RODJb-0002Eb-45 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:56:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2569821C051; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F4521C05B for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faan15 with SMTP id n15so2347010faa.40 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=rSLmXmeNN3Byqy/J813vLY3MtldJPBCclakxNAcyGVE=; b=mvchOZgL3UPezeYEJlPS481jRBe36Pd5d7Yayw2eZtO2UQHWEpr45ZuWkuea8RAO7J g/qW2ZBc1G4tATbaT1T1Hy/iPoT4ZJgELfM+FMg0osar2LAJbEIpUhVvRJzR5t0zE5Zs Txi9Sg+IoJQ317zjtcVBwmBnfwX2LSNtRLMkA= Received: by 10.223.16.145 with SMTP id o17mr6575134faa.20.1320864855780; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC607F6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.7.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm7676187faf.14.2011.11.09.10.54.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:54:14 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev rules for an iPod Touch? Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:54:12 +0100 Message-ID: <6520907.JpHmoyeC2f@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.7; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2215940.TJDmZqQsbe@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 81d1cba3-73b7-4508-a646-c12f4fc5a772 X-Archives-Hash: f4e660075782bccf7e00211703a47f87 Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > > wrote: > > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: > >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: > >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high > >> >> performance. > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it > >> > > >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. > >> > >> Broken in what way? > >> I am happily using it without any issues. > > > > the worst way: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw > > Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. > > Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the > best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, > but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know > it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however > that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it > successfully. > > What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of > Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just > down on the application because of what you read? > > - Mark except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machine deconstructing itself, no, no problems here. -- #163933