From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-174671-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42924139082
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:59:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCB58224232;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-x241.google.com (mail-yw0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::241])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A572E0EE3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-x241.google.com with SMTP id a10so9974563ywa.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:59:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=XZAE29dLvM7CU8k1NLlYlZ0t4zpBovn2KuVxmQoD0Og=;
        b=STViH4oz9VNTRlbmDrq2Sz9eCkDwG5N/BVdDRf938fbiUiFj0OwYXG15JqBjMH7aKW
         G9ia7Q2hIzHbq0kUzgR/VrGjhcVHWZEogsSJhZhhVC2xYtpcv2vP74Qq2vox/oAl/JsF
         dOiBvjhq7fRS1EJrMluHg1CjyYI/tNvc92m5I3urMN+V9jfJ4LbNyH2mibg1adnDblJd
         axrkoeaLUgp13cA3ldHpbHv4jxduA3XBBFRQJpR1LxDNz7OMPtETgLPVCeyqOHq6H51j
         kvTz51VzvgAZQt1zpE7LgxJC+5Z0Kf3IVqzjN7NsgCXCKT8XCWJmj6M35kVgi7ZWkY4G
         z91w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=XZAE29dLvM7CU8k1NLlYlZ0t4zpBovn2KuVxmQoD0Og=;
        b=M78jjCrzho5BJvf2XxkiUjLZQe0iLHgoR/qbyBuWYXambLOE1ZhqA2/xNI0fQNJ0hk
         pVhuhtf0vmwKhnrD+qrYRZre6g0UK0lZCPMOHMleie2wsfoh083k4RLPw7TtfnN03eu1
         L4tLJEiUTsPuo0IRnN/aXrhcBeBHcs5NvnWlqL5f7h8fsuNktEOt9OcxQ8+KIeODs0Qh
         jWiEC4GzrXEaLNocBi69+H5hdyexIjXFPD0o54oooiaQYqfj+gAtxImkOjVuP1rWjcsJ
         mhSXkdGMCc9P62HnEh2rq/jJIg8JbMlLyKIy+lu3i3uarbH/nrM7RkL6cYUjlprJxqRv
         /ELw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02iUmy+o3CWYYyR1S8o3t39VjEDjI/oNNm4m+jhbU9y61MYhOzOPpsBuIyDC6lOKQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.76.65 with SMTP id z62mr16012291ywa.87.1482209961449;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-95-121.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.95.121])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n192sm8775298ywd.51.2016.12.19.20.59.19
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 &
 Youtube... Audio: No
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20161015182743.GB4541@solfire>
 <20161216101951.GA29887@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_k+toE5DiWMPZrbnFqnJwVuQQ73B-rAmYeGTeyE-WKzBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161216131315.GA4052@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_=LvKf+pbq1Pfs_RfNUB76yFHz3Dv-FK0ZdFAMt_mAbYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161216165118.GA26704@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_=UDb35V==i5Ma3K6pNBBSyU0Ecp7_u97ZOYSfj-AwnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161217055520.GA13608@waltdnes.org> <87pokn23ai.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
 <4c7138ac-cbd2-c60f-2a86-bb7e41e9d6fb@gmail.com>
 <87r353zmfs.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
 <97c3b37f-be37-391c-2e16-b232c793156d@gmail.com>
 <87oa07xnzt.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <64e6b9bf-ec3e-d11c-e832-70b58e67a9ce@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:59:19 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87oa07xnzt.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: e0202528-3022-44b5-901f-74dcaf752e05
X-Archives-Hash: 2a5480b8c25b699de4a7d9e069fe9086

lee wrote:
> Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> lee wrote:
>>> Daniel Frey <djqfrey@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 12/19/2016 10:15 AM, lee wrote:
>>>>> "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Similarly, the vast majority of home users have a machine with one
>>>>>> ethernet port, and in the past it's always been eth0.
>>>>> Since 10 years or so, the default is two ports.
>>>> Not in any of the computers I've built. Generally only high end or
>>>> workstation/server boards have two ports.
>>>>
>>>> i.e. not what the typical home user would buy.
>>> It is not reasonable to assume that a "typical home user" would want a
>>> computer with a crappy board to run Linux on it (or for anything
>>> else). If they are that cheap, they're better off buying a used one.
>>> When they are sufficiently clueless to want something like that, what
>>> does it matter what the network interfaces are called.
>>>
>> I built my current rig just a few years ago.  It has one ethernet port
>> on it.  Since it didn't work right, bad drivers I guess, I added a card
>> to have the second port.  The rig I built before that, it also had one
>> ethernet port. 
>>
>> I might add, I didn't buy a "crappy board" either.  The first was Abit
>> which was the top rated brand at the time and my current board is
>> Gigabyte, another highly rated board at the time I bought it.
> I have no experience with Abit, and I can tell you from experience with
> a couple of them that Gigabyte is the worst junk for a board you can
> buy and that their support has no idea what they are doing.

Well, I have two of them and they work just fine.  I might add, Abit
gave me many years of 24/7 service.  Being outdated was its only
problem.  Also, Gigabyte and Asus were the top rated boards when I
bought my board.  Some who have been here long enough may even recall me
posting my buy list here on this mailing list.  So, you thinking
Gigabyte is junk can go in the same place as your thinking two ports on
every board is the default.   It's your opinion and not based on
reality.   I've learned the same usually applies to hard drives as well. 

>> As Daniel
>> points out, you have to get into some pretty high end boards before you
>> get two ethernet ports. 
>>
>> Just for giggles, I went and looked at Asus boards, currently highly
>> rated.  I had to get up around the $400 range to find two ports.  Most
>> computers built for home use, and even some, maybe most, business
>> computers, only have one port.  It's all they need. 
>>
>> I might also add, I have a lot of friends that give me their old
>> computers.  Of all the puters I have ever seen, they had one ethernet
>> port.  Over the past decade or so, I've likely stripped out a few dozen
>> computers for parts.  Not one of them had two ethernet ports. 
>>
>> I'm with Daniel on this one. 
> The last time I got a board that didn't have two ports is about 20 years
> ago, and I never bought one for 400.  They all just have 2, needed or
> not, even cheap ones.
>
>

Odd.  Just for giggles, I went to Newegg.  I pulled up both AMD and
Intel boards.  I then looked at the pictures of the top sellers listed
there.  With my settings, it lists 36 on each page.  Out of the first
page for each type, only a couple or so had two ports and only one that
I saw was under $200.00.  The rest were more expensive than that.  I
think that one $200.00 board was a Gigabyte by the way.  I doubt you
want to claim owning that, right?  Looked at 72 boards, only found a
couple or so with two ethernet ports. 

So, looking at a large website that has likely millions of customers,
carries about every brand of board there is, I could only find a very
small percentage of boards that have two ethernet ports built in.  That
is not what a reasonable person would call the default.  If it was the
default as you claim, then there should only be a few that don't have
two ports.  You add in that Daniel, Taiidan and myself have not seen
such a default, then I think you are mistaken. 

Dale

:-)  :-)