From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-64404-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HrQIR-0003q3-3F
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 03:16:56 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4P3E26S011497;
Fri, 25 May 2007 03:14:02 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4P39dD0006760
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 May 2007 03:09:40 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so195927uge
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=FWiRmCG0Zfx/vM8H+kdmhgRVIQ/6xJxIC3GQZH1g0ZbcW2rqeuWArDwrttWQfnrQbB6zGGBzB7X3GTzc9xslrl8YEHMbrICelNKGTMR06LBmIlw4sgLrn75R6x37tJr2KCwWxEgQD1v25p+PwW1upEnV3FXyVmPMrnKxE7UuLLM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=Fp6lrXOQgvQIpT4rmLJ6gZXNsnYNsspGCMQfK4Xr/yBD/UFyO/JalAKEYQq3+QhsNYAKl5ZWQTS0QDpTUJgb2shTYxbUmO3Kx1HS4EqjWd1AXpUhYj2P+KpUzKeVckq67rgWqMnQHZk5UeLUm+AI0qeAKtyLD7mFo+yDouP1R2w=
Received: by 10.78.157.19 with SMTP id f19mr726643hue.1180062579602;
Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.83.20 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <642958cc0705242009i7e2bd27at2da023f82ae9986b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:09:39 -0400
From: "Mark Shields" <laebshade@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sharing portage directories when dual booting x86 and amd64
In-Reply-To: <20070525004626.62551b2d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_91115_14546641.1180062579563"
References: <yu9wsyx7vbg.fsf@nyu.edu>
<642958cc0705241451r4d4b334br2458cd9f074ced5c@mail.gmail.com>
<20070525004626.62551b2d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
X-Archives-Salt: 2eb8ec07-d639-4160-b360-98515287ba23
X-Archives-Hash: 472758ab1b96bc4420bbb9999e2c9851
------=_Part_91115_14546641.1180062579563
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 5/24/07, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:51:09 -0400, Mark Shields wrote:
>
> > You can probably share all of them, but just realize the distfiles for
> > x86 won't be usable for amd64 and vice-versa (unless you're going to
> > use an x86 distfile on the amd64 because there isn't an amd64 version
> > available).
>
> Of course they will, because they contains source code. Of course,
> sometimes there will be different versions of a package marked stable in
> x86 and amd64, and some patch files are arch-specific, but generally most
> packages use the same source files whatever the architecture. I use a
> shared $DISTDIR for x86, ~x86, ~amd64 and ~ppc systems.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
>
>
Yeah, you're right. Now that I re-read it, I realized I was thinking, for
some odd reason, that he was talking about the kernel.
--
- Mark Shields
------=_Part_91115_14546641.1180062579563
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 5/24/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Neil Bothwick</b> <<a href="mailto:neil@digimed.co.uk">neil@digimed.co.uk</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:51:09 -0400, Mark Shields wrote:<br><br>> You can probably share all of them, but just realize the distfiles for<br>> x86 won't be usable for amd64 and vice-versa (unless you're going to
<br>> use an x86 distfile on the amd64 because there isn't an amd64 version<br>> available).<br><br>Of course they will, because they contains source code. Of course,<br>sometimes there will be different versions of a package marked stable in
<br>x86 and amd64, and some patch files are arch-specific, but generally most<br>packages use the same source files whatever the architecture. I use a<br>shared $DISTDIR for x86, ~x86, ~amd64 and ~ppc systems.<br><br><br>
--<br>Neil Bothwick<br><br>Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">Yeah, you're right. Now that I re-read it, I realized I was thinking, for some odd reason, that he was talking about the kernel.
<br>-- <br>- Mark Shields
------=_Part_91115_14546641.1180062579563--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list